Teams

SMU/Park W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

22 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs The Nelson/Wood W4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesTory Redington-Chauza / Lori Walker vs Blaine Eschenburg / Tammy French6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNicola Bremer / Cindy Freeman vs Clare Holbrook / Vesna Gray6-1, 6-1
2025-06-17vs Samuell Grand/McGill-Beirute W4.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMichelle Marketos / Nicola Bremer vs Bridget Goldman / Miriam Trevino4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Shouse / Abby McMullen vs Jessica Tse / Alexa Mallard3-6, 3-6
2025-06-05Lost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Koechel / Michelle Marketos vs Monique Black / Candice Ewing7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWendi Kaplan / Cindy Freeman vs Julie Murray / Elizabeth Nevelow2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Park / Dana Koerner vs Brittani Yoo / Enya He6-7, 1-6
2025-05-29vs Royal Oaks/Munir W4.0Lost 12
L#2 DoublesAllison Lewis / Angie Woltjen vs Christina Bell / Tami Skorpil2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesErin Koechel vs Anne-Marie Morrow6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicola Bremer / Eve Petrucelli vs Julianne Evans / Elizabeth King3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Donohoe / Erin Koechel vs Eugenia Viejobueno / Christina Perron6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Walker / Wendi Kaplan vs Caryn Angus / Melissa Reilly7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNicola Bremer / Robin Stone vs Edith Kruckmann / Daisha Moore6-7, 1-6
2025-05-15Lost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Koechel / Tory Redington-Chauza vs Valerie van Ausdall / Jill Nail6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Woltjen / Margaret Shouse vs Cindy Taylor / Sundee McDonald4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDana Koerner / Beth Park vs Jennifer Dugan / Aimee Cali6-7, 5-7
2025-05-08vs Lakewood/Diaz-Dix W4.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesRobin Stone / Eve Petrucelli vs Lindsey Diaz / Brooke McGonigle6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShirley Crow / Ellen Beren vs Sally Stephenson / Jennifer Campiti3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-02vs McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Koechel / Tory Redington-Chauza vs Emily Chapman / Jennifer Jacobs6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendi Kaplan / Cindy Freeman vs Holly Carraway / Amy Irons6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Lewis / Beth Park vs Amy Farrell / Sally Purdy3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Soldan-Dove W4.080291128275
2Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.07132822263
3Lakes/Buckalew-Criswell W4.071271336339
4Garland/Smith-Bradley W4.071241637325
5Colleyville Park/Coffindaffer W4.0 (F2025 WC)62281232300
6Greenhill/Nevelow W4.062241638329
7Samuell Grand/McGill-Beirute W4.062241638329
8High Point/Davis-Jenkins W4.062221842364
9Royal Oaks/Munir W4.062202045343
10Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.053291127299
11Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.053241636335
12Oak Creek/Jackson-Trousil W4.053231739349
13Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.053221839325
14SMU/Park W4.044241640335
15McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.044221844361
16DCC/Beecherl W4.044211945361
17DAC/Fellman-Jolly W4.035211947391
18Huffhines/Ethington W4.035172353399
19DAC/Moore-Carothers W4.035132760409
20Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.026172353383
21Gleneagles/Shukis-Lofgren W4.026142653385
22Stonebriar/Woodson W4.026132756396
23McKinney/Cady W4.017152553386
24The Nelson/Wood W4.017152554384
25RGAC/Hill W4.008112959410
26Lakewood/Diaz-Dix W4.00863472452
27T bar M/Dodgen-LaRosen W4.00833776466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Lisa Donohoe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.97
Michelle Marketos
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Erin Schreyer
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #2 Singles 8% · published 4
3.79
Erin Koechel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
Dana Koerner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Tory Redington-Chauza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Nicola Bremer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Wendi Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Elizabeth Vice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Robin Stone
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.61
Allison Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Barbara Forkel
published 4
3.58
Angie Woltjen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Margaret Shouse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Cindy Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Abby McMullen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eve Petrucelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Beth Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ellen Beren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Shirley Crow
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Meredith Mabus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tory Redington-Chauza + Michelle Marketos6362% games+7.6% vs expected
Erin Koechel + Michelle Marketos4355% games+6.5% vs expected
Wendi Kaplan + Lisa Donohoe19459% games+3.9% vs expected
Robin Stone + Lisa Donohoe6155% games−2.4% vs expected
Wendi Kaplan + Elizabeth Vice141348% games−9.7% vs expected
Wendi Kaplan + Robin Stone3346% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Shouse + Ellen Beren044 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Crow + Ellen Beren224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Donohoe
58W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.19
Michelle Marketos
33W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Erin Schreyer
47W–11L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Erin Koechel
12W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Dana Koerner
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tory Redington-Chauza
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Nicola Bremer
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Wendi Kaplan
41W–30L career · 12 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Elizabeth Vice
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Robin Stone
24W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Allison Lewis
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Barbara Forkel
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Angie Woltjen
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Margaret Shouse
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Cindy Freeman
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Abby McMullen
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Eve Petrucelli
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Beth Park
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Ellen Beren
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Shirley Crow
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Lori Walker
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Mabus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.