Teams

Garland/Smith-Bradley W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs RGAC/Hill W4.0Split 11
W#2 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Gina Hancock6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTeri Wilson / Bonnie Shea vs Christina Lafferty / Phine Kalonji1-6, 0-6
2025-06-19vs Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesRenee Aaron vs Ranee Owenby6-3, 7-5
2025-06-12vs Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Young / Kristl Pearl vs Tricia Roos / Louise Bexley4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Simmons / Renee Aaron vs Leah Oliver / Leigh Breunig6-2, 6-2
2025-06-05vs Stonebriar/Woodson W4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesHolly Simmons / Renee Aaron vs Michelle Woodson / Elka Wyse6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAnita Kovacs vs Joanie Buster6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-29vs DAC/Fellman-Jolly W4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Aaron / Elaine Payne vs Kelly Musgrave / Lauren Becker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Young / Kristl Pearl vs Tiffany Webster / Yvette Freeman6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnita Kovacs vs Shannon DeVilbiss6-1, 6-0
2025-05-22vs High Point/Davis-Jenkins W4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesAnita Kovacs vs Li Wang6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRenee Aaron / Holly Simmons vs Hope Heldmar / Claudia Villegas6-2, 6-4
2025-05-15Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMARY DAMKROGER / Margaret Hoyt vs Kate Chalupa / Ryane Criswell0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Shea / Renee Aaron vs Heather Helsel / Susan Quill2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristl Pearl / Jennifer Young vs Rosalyn Luong / Lindsey McDavid6-2, 7-5
2025-05-08vs DCC/Beecherl W4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBonnie Shea / Renee Aaron vs Haylie Crouch / Kim Wyly6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Natalie Clarkson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Anita Kovacs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Renee Aaron
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.69
Lisa Buitron
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Bonnie Shea
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kristl Pearl
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
MARY DAMKROGER
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.60
Teri Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Elaine Payne
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Michelle Hefner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Stacey Zartler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Amber Morefield
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Kimberly DiNota
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Margaret Hoyt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Reshma Ganapathy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Shannon Vivian
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Suzie Kohler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Wilson + Stacey Zartler12365% games+6.4% vs expected
Kimberly DiNota + MARY DAMKROGER7359% games+2.4% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Kristl Pearl7354% games−1.1% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Elaine Payne4253% gamesnot enough data
Amber Morefield + Lisa Buitron4254% gamesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + Kimberly DiNota3244% gamesnot enough data
Renee Aaron + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Renee Aaron + Elaine Payne213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Clarkson
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Anita Kovacs
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Aaron
43W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Lisa Buitron
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Bonnie Shea
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Kristl Pearl
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
MARY DAMKROGER
38W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Teri Wilson
37W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Elaine Payne
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Michelle Hefner
19W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Stacey Zartler
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Amber Morefield
26W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kimberly DiNota
25W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Margaret Hoyt
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Reshma Ganapathy
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Vivian
12W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzie Kohler
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.