Teams

Tebeaux

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 7.5 Ladies

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-25vs CooperWon 21
W#1 DoublesKera Watts / Jan McKean vs Tiffany Haertling / Noelle Ratliff3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSummer Richbourg / Kimberly Grogan vs Renee Aaron / Leah Truitt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeresa Albus / Kayla Saing vs Theresa Batoon / Paula Cooper6-4, 6-4
2025-05-25vs MooreWon 30
W#1 DoublesCayla Jackson / Blair Small vs Joi MacY / Lori Bennett5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAya Singleton / Izumi Webb vs Jill Moore / Annette Baker7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGilda Tebeaux / Cynthia Cordial vs Allison Nicks / Stacy Burdick6-1, 6-1
2025-05-24vs MillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesCayla Jackson / Blair Small vs Kimberly Muller / Shelley Duron6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGilda Tebeaux / Cynthia Cordial vs Kelly McCullough / Amy Whitehead6-2, 6-3
2025-05-24vs AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKera Watts / Jan McKean vs Lori Sciremammano / Vicki Rose6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAya Singleton / Izumi Webb vs Charlotte Rice / Julie McGuire6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Springer / Kayla Saing vs Jenna Xiong / Donna Schoolfield6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-23vs HudnallWon 30
W#1 DoublesJan McKean / Kera Watts vs Kelsey Jackson / Lupe Cocita6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Springer / Kayla Saing vs Judy Watts / Lynn Jumper6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCynthia Cordial / Gilda Tebeaux vs Ruth Strong / Tracy Groves6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Kera Watts
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.90
Cayla Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Kimberly Grogan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
Katie Springer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Gilda Tebeaux
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Kayla Saing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Teresa Albus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.71
Aya Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Blair Small
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Izumi Webb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Cynthia Cordial
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Jan McKean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Summer Richbourg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Albus + Kera Watts6069% games+11.2% vs expected
Gilda Tebeaux + Kimberly Grogan121354% games+6.7% vs expected
Summer Richbourg + Jan McKean11162% games+5.7% vs expected
Teresa Albus + Kimberly Grogan31146% games−2.9% vs expected
Jan McKean + Kera Watts404 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Cordial + Gilda Tebeaux303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kera Watts
53W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Cayla Jackson
28W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kimberly Grogan
62W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
Katie Springer
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Gilda Tebeaux
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Kayla Saing
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Teresa Albus
32W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Aya Singleton
32W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Blair Small
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Izumi Webb
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cynthia Cordial
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jan McKean
62W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Summer Richbourg
60W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.