Teams

Je.Phillips18M

2023 Cap 18 & Over Mixed · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-23vs Me.Everitt18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeme Avent / Scott Lundy vs Melissa House / Stephen Holmes6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLawrence Brock / Jennifer Brock vs Noah Yao / Amber Cagle6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-07-09vs Ga.Lovejoy18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Kempf / Greg Kempf vs Lance Williams / Jenna Raynor0-6, 1-6
2023-06-25vs To.Sutler18MLost 12
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Jennifer Brock vs Kevin Hampton / Amanda Campbell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLincoln Larson / Jeme Avent vs April Lyon / Scott Cruikshank3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSue Norcia / Greg Kempf vs Brian McLean / Christine Hughes4-6, 6-7
2023-06-11vs Ta.LeFevre18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Kempf / Greg Kempf vs Brent Townsend / Kelly Townsend6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-05vs Ke.Johnston18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Brock / Lawrence Brock vs Holly Moore / Robert Moore6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeme Avent / David Coman vs Jason Grieco / Barbra Wait6-3, 6-0
2023-06-04vs Je.Brooks18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeme Avent / David Coman vs Daniel Hill / Sharon Fred3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Allison Graves
published 4.5
3.96
Lawrence Brock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Jeme Avent
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.38
Lisa Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Brock
published
3.17
Scott Lundy
published
3.15
Lincoln Larson
published
3.11
David Coman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.08
Greg Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Ronald Elliott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kempf + Greg Kempf142545% games−9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Graves
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Lawrence Brock
324W–121L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Jeme Avent
296W–147L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Lisa Kempf
365W–300L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.38
Jennifer Brock
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Scott Lundy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.17
Lincoln Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3
David Coman
87W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Greg Kempf
45W–121L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Ronald Elliott
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.