Teams

CCOC BAILEY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.89 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-28vs MEMPK ITENLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Banet / Claudia Goddard vs Olivia Salmon / Nancy Barker0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Noriko Moody6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAugusta Kluk / Jasmine Wolcott vs Jennifer Kapitan / Stephanie King2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesKristina Bodoczky vs Mallory Marlin4-6, 2-6
2025-05-19vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarbi Bailey / Jillian Mayles vs Kara Jewett / WENDY WESTON7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristina Bodoczky / Megan May vs Terri Plummer / Jennifer Madden4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDawn Conley vs Janae Kite0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Banet / Krista McCallister vs Haley Rogers / Susan Hilton6-4, 7-5
2025-05-12vs CCW FALKLost 14
L#1 DoublesKrista McCallister / Jillian Mayles vs Renee Crisler / Catherine McWhorter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Banet vs Kimberly Schumacher .6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Conley / Megan May vs April Falk / Wendy Jones2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKristina Bodoczky vs Terry Olerich7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesIvy Webb / Leah Derksen vs Hilda Sabelstrom / Emily Butler4-6, 6-7
2025-05-05vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 14
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Kelly Banet vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJillian Mayles vs Lorin Barcus3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKristina Bodoczky / Barbi Bailey vs Jamie Roach / Melissa Morino3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKrista McCallister vs Martina Levkus0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIvy Webb / Leah Derksen vs Amy Saxby / Kristi Creps6-7, 0-6
2025-04-28vs MEMPK LOWERYLost 14
L#1 DoublesMegan May / Kristina Bodoczky vs Maggie Hartman / Gina Scheper6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeah Derksen vs Shelby Johnson5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJillian Mayles / Ivy Webb vs Sara Michon / Tracy Glaser6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKelly Banet vs Megan Burton2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Goddard / Dawn Conley vs Christina Bardsley / Jenni Ehrlin1-6, 2-6
2025-04-21vs CSRC CORRALLost 14
L#1 DoublesKrista McCallister / Jillian Mayles vs Jennifer Mutka / Kady Hommel2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Derksen vs Monica MacLiz6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbi Bailey / Elizabeth Kelly vs Wendy Rhoten / Sara Scroggins6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesClaudia Goddard vs Candace McCollett2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristina Bodoczky / Megan May vs Carolayne Henry / Gina Baaklini3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Barbi Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Jillian Mayles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Augusta Kluk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ivy Webb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Kristina Bodoczky
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Leah Derksen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.65
Megan May
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Krista McCallister
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.59
Kelly Banet
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.30
Claudia Goddard
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dawn Conley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jasmine Wolcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbi Bailey + Kristina Bodoczky6352% games+6.2% vs expected
Jillian Mayles + Krista McCallister20755% games+4.3% vs expected
Megan May + Barbi Bailey6259% games+2.8% vs expected
Ivy Webb + Leah Derksen2542% games−4.6% vs expected
Megan May + Krista McCallister2438% games−5.3% vs expected
Kelly Banet + Dawn Conley2444% games−7.8% vs expected
Barbi Bailey + Krista McCallister4447% gamesnot enough data
Megan May + Kristina Bodoczky3351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbi Bailey
73W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Jillian Mayles
78W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Augusta Kluk
17W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Ivy Webb
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Kristina Bodoczky
32W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Leah Derksen
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Megan May
47W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Krista McCallister
36W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Kelly Banet
26W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Claudia Goddard
66W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Dawn Conley
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jasmine Wolcott
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.