Teams

CCW FALK

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-26vs MEMPK LOWERYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRenee Crisler / April Falk vs Gina Scheper / Maggie Hartman6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEline Haak vs Shelby Johnson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTerry Olerich / Hilda Sabelstrom vs Sara Michon / Christina Bardsley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Brewer / Emily Butler vs Carmen Ekblad / Megan Burton0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-19vs CSRC CORRALWon 32
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Catherine McWhorter vs Leanne Thompson / Kady Hommel6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEline Haak vs Candace McCollett4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRenee Crisler / Leslie Brewer vs Diana Garcia-Poore / Sara Breese6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKimberly Schumacher . vs Monica MacLiz6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEmily Butler / Hilda Sabelstrom vs Gina Baaklini / Carolayne Henry0-6, 6-7
2025-05-15vs MEMPK ITENLost 23
W#1 DoublesRenee Crisler / Catherine McWhorter vs Nancy Barker / Olivia Salmon6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Butler vs Noriko Moody1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Jennifer Kapitan / Stephanie King1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKimberly Schumacher . vs Kimberly McLaurin6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Brewer / Hilda Sabelstrom vs Bonnie Iten / Julia Hershey1-6, 3-6
2025-05-12vs CCOC BAILEYWon 41
W#1 DoublesRenee Crisler / Catherine McWhorter vs Krista McCallister / Jillian Mayles3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKimberly Schumacher . vs Kelly Banet7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Dawn Conley / Megan May6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTerry Olerich vs Kristina Bodoczky6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHilda Sabelstrom / Emily Butler vs Ivy Webb / Leah Derksen6-4, 7-6
2025-04-28vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERWon 32
W#1 DoublesRenee Crisler / Catherine McWhorter vs Ann Grumann / Salome D'Silva6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Butler vs Janae Kite6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberly Schumacher . / Leslie Brewer vs WENDY WESTON / Kara Jewett2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTerry Olerich vs Haley Rogers6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWendy Jones / Christine Butler vs Judy Kaltenbacher / Kateri Kaltenbacher2-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 23
L#1 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Melissa Morino / Jamie Roach6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRenee Crisler vs Martina Levkus7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine McWhorter / Kimberly Schumacher . vs Maggie Wilson / Leslie Jaworowski4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEline Haak vs Lorin Barcus6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHilda Sabelstrom / Emily Butler vs Amy Saxby / Chelsey Wright1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Eline Haak
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.86
April Falk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Renee Crisler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.68
Catherine McWhorter
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Leslie Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Emily Butler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.60
Kimberly Schumacher .
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.59
Terry Olerich
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Hilda Sabelstrom
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Christine Butler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine McWhorter + Renee Crisler5052% games−4.8% vs expected
Hilda Sabelstrom + Emily Butler134 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Sabelstrom + Kimberly Schumacher .134 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Sabelstrom + Terry Olerich033 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Sabelstrom + Leslie Brewer123 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Sabelstrom + Renee Crisler123 matchesnot enough data
Terry Olerich + Emily Butler123 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Brewer + Renee Crisler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eline Haak
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
April Falk
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Renee Crisler
15W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Catherine McWhorter
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Leslie Brewer
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Emily Butler
42W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Kimberly Schumacher .
33W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Terry Olerich
22W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Hilda Sabelstrom
5W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Christine Butler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.