Teams

MEMPK ITEN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-28vs CCOC BAILEYWon 41
W#1 DoublesOlivia Salmon / Nancy Barker vs Kelly Banet / Claudia Goddard6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Jillian Mayles1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kapitan / Stephanie King vs Augusta Kluk / Jasmine Wolcott6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMallory Marlin vs Kristina Bodoczky6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Shinobu Voss vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-15vs CCW FALKWon 32
L#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Renee Crisler / Catherine McWhorter4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Emily Butler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kapitan / Stephanie King vs April Falk / Wendy Jones6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKimberly McLaurin vs Kimberly Schumacher .3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Iten / Julia Hershey vs Leslie Brewer / Hilda Sabelstrom6-1, 6-3
2025-05-12vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERWon 41
L#1 DoublesShinobu Voss / Nancy Barker vs WENDY WESTON / Kara Jewett4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Tatiana Merkoulova6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kapitan / Stephanie King vs Judy Kaltenbacher / Kateri Kaltenbacher7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesOlivia Salmon vs Susan Hilton2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Iten / Kayla Breedlove vs Jennifer Madden / Terri Plummer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-28vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 23
L#1 DoublesBonnie Iten / Terry Beutelschies vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMallory Marlin vs Martina Levkus2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Melissa Morino / Jamie Roach4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Elayna Rathmann6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kapitan / Stephanie King vs Lorin Barcus / Catherine Mast6-4, 6-1
2025-04-21vs MEMPK LOWERYLost 23
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Stephanie King vs Gina Scheper / Maggie Hartman6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMallory Marlin vs Shelby Johnson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNoriko Moody / Shinobu Voss vs Olivia Boudreau / Carmen Ekblad3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKimberly McLaurin vs Christina Bardsley4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBonnie Iten / Kayla Breedlove vs Kristen Lowery / Jenni Ehrlin6-2, 6-4
2025-04-14vs CSRC CORRALWon 41
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Leanne Thompson / Jessica Whisenant7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNoriko Moody vs Candace McCollett4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMallory Marlin / Stephanie King vs Jennifer Mutka / Jane Corral4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKimberly McLaurin vs Monica MacLiz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Iten / Terry Beutelschies vs Diana Garcia-Poore / Sara Breese3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mallory Marlin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.86
Nancy Barker
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Noriko Moody
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.71
Terry Beutelschies
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Bonnie Iten
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Kayla Breedlove
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Kimberly McLaurin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Julia Hershey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jennifer Kapitan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Shinobu Voss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barker + Olivia Salmon8453% games−0.3% vs expected
Julia Hershey + Bonnie Iten4153% gamesnot enough data
Kayla Breedlove + Bonnie Iten213 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Iten + Terry Beutelschies213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Marlin
23W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Noriko Moody
20W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Terry Beutelschies
93W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Bonnie Iten
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Kayla Breedlove
43W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Kimberly McLaurin
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Julia Hershey
39W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jennifer Kapitan
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shinobu Voss
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.