Teams

PINEY RUN

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-10vs DC RacqueteersWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Chris Takiar6-4, 6-0
2024-09-07vs Alley CatsLost 12
L#1 SinglesBen Winik vs Jonathan Rauch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNathanael DeJonge vs Martin Hunka6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Shea Lilly0-6, 6-6
2024-08-18Won 20
W#2 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-28vs DJ KittenWon 30
W#1 SinglesAli Hamdani vs Bradley Kesling6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKenta Goto vs Daniel Sablosky6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNathanael DeJonge vs Joel Taylor6-1, 6-2
2024-07-21vs PR SlicersWon 30
W#1 SinglesTerrence Austin vs Peter Gwynn-Sackson6-0, 4-2
W#2 SinglesBen Winik vs Paul Banks7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKenta Goto vs Steven Park6-2, 6-2
2024-07-14vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKenta Goto vs Anzor Misabishvili6-0, 6-3
2024-07-07Won 10
W#3 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kenta Goto
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Ali Hamdani
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.61
Keitaro Nishimura
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.40
Ben Winik
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Samuel Fontanez
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Nathanael DeJonge
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.49
Penelope Wilson
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Terrence Austin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Hamdani + Nathanael DeJonge4163% gamesnot enough data
Ali Hamdani + Samuel Fontanez224 matchesnot enough data
Nathanael DeJonge + Ben Winik404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kenta Goto
57W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Ali Hamdani
52W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Keitaro Nishimura
148W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Ben Winik
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Samuel Fontanez
71W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Nathanael DeJonge
25W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Penelope Wilson
34W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Terrence Austin
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.