Teams

PR Slicers

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-07vs 3.5 TerminettersWon 20
W#1 SinglesKeenan Keeling vs John Burns6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMalcolm Magee vs Kenneth Shin6-1, 3-1
2024-08-25vs Alley CatsLost 03
L#1 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Jonathan Rauch3-6, 2-5
L#2 SinglesSteven Park vs Chandler Wong4-6, 3-4
L#3 SinglesPaul Banks vs Martin Hunka2-6, 5-3
2024-08-17vs DC RacqueteersLost 02
L#1 SinglesPaul Banks vs Chris Takiar6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Bryan Bassig4-6, 0-6
2024-08-04vs DJ KittenWon 20
W#1 SinglesKeenan Keeling vs Conner Fox6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSteven Park vs Daniel Sablosky6-0, 6-0
2024-07-28vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Anzor Misabishvili4-6, 0-3
L#2 SinglesKeenan Keeling vs Stephen Lambrides2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMalcolm Magee vs Jonathan Hartness2-6, 1-6
2024-07-21vs PINEY RUNLost 03
L#1 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Terrence Austin0-6, 2-4
L#2 SinglesPaul Banks vs Ben Winik5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSteven Park vs Kenta Goto2-6, 2-6
2024-07-14vs Chip N ChargeLost 12
L#1 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Patrick Joy3-6, 5-6
L#2 SinglesPaul Banks vs Kevin Joy2-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesSteven Park vs Travis Langenkamp6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alley Cats0713819158
2DC Racqueteers07111019146
3PR Slicers0751630186
43.5 Terminetters0741734216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Matthew Holubecki
published
3.55
Peter Gwynn-Sackson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Steven Park
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.21
Keenan Keeling
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Paul Banks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.92
Malcolm Magee
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Holubecki
53W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Peter Gwynn-Sackson
35W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
Steven Park
57W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Keenan Keeling
85W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Paul Banks
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Malcolm Magee
58W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.