Teams

Alley Cats

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-07vs PINEY RUNWon 21
W#1 SinglesJonathan Rauch vs Ben Winik3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMartin Hunka vs Nathanael DeJonge3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesShea Lilly vs Samuel Fontanez6-0, 6-6
2024-08-25vs PR SlicersWon 30
W#1 SinglesJonathan Rauch vs Peter Gwynn-Sackson6-3, 5-2
W#2 SinglesChandler Wong vs Steven Park6-4, 4-3
W#3 SinglesMartin Hunka vs Paul Banks6-2, 3-5
2024-08-11vs Chip N ChargeLost 03
L#1 SinglesChandler Wong vs Shawn Drury5-7, 4-5
L#2 SinglesKazuki Ko vs John Paul Joy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesStark Hong vs Brian Gorman4-6, 1-6
2024-08-10vs 3.5 TerminettersWon 20
W#1 SinglesChandler Wong vs Kenneth Shin6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKazuki Ko vs Charles Anamelechi6-1, 6-0
2024-07-28vs DC RacqueteersLost 12
L#1 SinglesMartin Hunka vs Chris Takiar4-6, 0-4
W#2 SinglesShea Lilly vs Adnan Karimi6-4, 3-3
L#3 SinglesStark Hong vs Hassaan Karim2-6, 2-5
2024-07-27vs DJ KittenWon 30
W#1 SinglesIsmael Sere vs Olugbenga Okubadejo6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesShea Lilly vs Daniel Sablosky6-4, 5-3
W#3 SinglesStark Hong vs Andrew Taylor4-6, 4-1
2024-07-07vs Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 SinglesIsmael Sere vs Tucker Howard3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShea Lilly vs Jesse Cebulash1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJonathan Rauch vs Sharif Charles6-3, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alley Cats0713819158
2DC Racqueteers07111019146
3PR Slicers0751630186
43.5 Terminetters0741734216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Chandler Wong
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Ismael Sere
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Kazuki Ko
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Shea Lilly
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Jonathan Rauch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Martin Hunka
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Stark Hong
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chandler Wong
36W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Ismael Sere
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.54
Kazuki Ko
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.16
Shea Lilly
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Jonathan Rauch
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martin Hunka
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stark Hong
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.