Teams

Pandas (Flexible)

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-05vs L & SLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennie Cecil-Moore / Erika Johansen vs Sarah Vogel / Marni Klein5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-07-22vs Swiftlee KimdroWon 10
W#1 DoublesErika Johansen / Jennie Cecil-Moore vs Donna Kim / Claudia Sadro5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-17vs Supreme CourtLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Johansen / Jennie Cecil-Moore vs Alice Bankson / Lois James6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-07-07vs LiMiNiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennie Cecil-Moore / Erika Johansen vs Lisa Foisy / Nirachara Chintakananda6-3, 6-2
2022-07-07vs Team Awesome FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennie Cecil-Moore / Erika Johansen vs Lisa Vincent / Susan Lusty7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-29vs Taco!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennie Cecil-Moore / Erika Johansen vs Arlene Flor / Arden Hofler4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jennie Cecil-Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Erika Johansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Cecil-Moore + Erika Johansen7654% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennie Cecil-Moore
80W–96L career · 6 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Erika Johansen
69W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.