Teams

Taco!

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-05vs Swiftlee KimdroLost 01
L#1 DoublesArlene Flor / Erin Hawk vs Meta Lee / Claudia Sadro3-6, 4-6
2022-07-31vs Supreme CourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Forfylow / Rachel Mansfield vs Keiko Aikawa / Kathy Yang-Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-30vs LiMiNiWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Forfylow / Rachel Mansfield vs Lisa Foisy / Nirachara Chintakananda6-0, 6-3
2022-07-24vs L & SLost 01
L#1 DoublesDana Forfylow / Erin Hawk vs Sarah Vogel / Marni Klein4-6, 2-6
2022-07-13vs Team Awesome FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Flor / Erin Hawk vs Susan Lusty / Suzan Mazor6-2, 6-2
2022-06-29vs Pandas (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Flor / Arden Hofler vs Jennie Cecil-Moore / Erika Johansen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Rachel Mansfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Erin Hawk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dana Forfylow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Julie Park
published 3
2.59
Arlene Flor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Arden Hofler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Forfylow + Rachel Mansfield6072% games+10.5% vs expected
Erin Hawk + Rachel Mansfield231153% games+1.8% vs expected
Erin Hawk + Arlene Flor9553% games+1.1% vs expected
Erin Hawk + Dana Forfylow6650% games+0.6% vs expected
Arden Hofler + Arlene Flor171257% games−1.9% vs expected
Rachel Mansfield + Arlene Flor314 matchesnot enough data
Dana Forfylow + Arlene Flor033 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Mansfield + Arden Hofler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachel Mansfield
57W–46L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Erin Hawk
63W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dana Forfylow
45W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Julie Park
28W–23L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Arlene Flor
58W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Arden Hofler
46W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.