Search

Dana Forfylow

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
91 matches · 45W–46L · seasons 20192025
Where Dana sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Dana is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dana has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dana has gone from the 68th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
59.2%
29W–20L · 53.9% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
L
Christy Chang / Jacky Grotle
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cross
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Kathleen Ericksen / Lissa Dashe
2025-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Olson
0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Johnson
0.025below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Barbara Smith / Mary Adkins
2025-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Johansen
+0.032better than expected — took 68% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Dawn Williams / Roseshel Howe
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Olson
0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Christine Bloch / Ana Reyes
2025-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arden Hofler
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Julia Sommerfeld / Aleana Harris
2025-01-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arlene Flor
0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Teanen Chen / Belle Chen
2024-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hawk
+0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Rachel Kim / Sandra Arnez
2024-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hawk
+0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hawk
0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Radhakrishnan
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 31% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hawk
0.045below expectation — took 38% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.