Teams

Cambier - D. Packo

2022 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-19vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 10
W#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Robert Jewett6-2, 6-0
2022-05-12vs Pelican Bay Park - JuanWon 10
W#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Jeff Berns6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-05vs Marco YMCA - BreshinLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Crisp / John Healy vs James Ray / Stephen Kuhn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Riverstone - C. MarchandLost 01
L#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs George Anderson2-6, 2-6
2022-04-19vs Cambier - HirschLost 02
L#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Alex Farrow2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDylan Ball / John Healy vs Garrett Carney / Chadwick Commers2-6, 2-6
2022-04-14vs Pelican Bay Park - JuanWon 20
W#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Bryan Fowler6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Healy / Dylan Ball vs Francisco Suarez / Jaime Weisinger2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Rejai Goodridge5-7, 6-7
2022-03-24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesWilliam Watkins vs Tony Kamen2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Grant Packo
published 4.5
3.90
Zoltan Seles
published
3.65
Tyler Wood
published
3.59
William Watkins
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.38
Ian Mock
published 4
3.36
John Franta
published
3.35
Scott Wagner
published
3.17
David Packo
published 3.5
3.15
David Crisp
published 3.5
2.73
John Healy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Wood + Zoltan Seles3844% games−3.0% vs expected
David Packo + Tyler Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grant Packo
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.96
Zoltan Seles
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Tyler Wood
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
William Watkins
13W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Ian Mock
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
John Franta
30W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Scott Wagner
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
David Packo
11W–26L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
David Crisp
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
John Healy
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.