Teams

Marco YMCA - Breshin

2022 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-24vs Riverstone - C. MarchandSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobert Jewett / Eric Szczepanski vs Chris Marchand / Brian Bonacci4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Kuhn / Richard Lewis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-19vs Cambier - D. PackoLost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Lewis / Stephen Kuhn vs David Packo / Shane Kelley6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRobert Jewett vs William Watkins2-6, 0-6
2022-05-14vs Pelican Bay Park - JuanLost 01
L#2 SinglesRobert Jewett vs Jeff Berns2-6, 1-6
2022-05-05vs Cambier - D. PackoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Lewis / Brock Wilson vs Zoltan Seles / Ian Mock1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Jewett / Eric Szczepanski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-14vs Cambier - HirschLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Lewis / Robert Jewett vs Garrett Carney / Chadwick Commers2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStephen Kuhn / Richard Lewis vs Gavin Szoka / Chris Gold4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJames Ray / Robert Jewett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-31vs Quail West - C. HayesLost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Lewis / Stephen Kuhn vs Charles Hayes / Gary Schaum4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJim Halpin / Robert Jewett vs Ralph Oswald / Kevin Wilson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Ray
published 4
3.70
Anthony Polonio
published 4
3.66
Jeffrey Saviano
published
3.51
Joseph Kardek
published
3.30
Jim Halpin
published
James Ray
published 3.5
Richard Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Robert Jewett
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Stephen Kuhn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Kardek + Jeffrey Saviano0634% games−14.4% vs expected
Robert Jewett + Richard Lewis4363% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Ray
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Anthony Polonio
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Jeffrey Saviano
7W–20L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Jim Halpin
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
James Ray
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Lewis
118W–158L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Jewett
105W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Kuhn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.