Teams

Riverstone - C. Marchand

2022 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-24vs Marco YMCA - BreshinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBobby Marks / David Townsley vs James Ray / David Ray6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPaul Christie vs Jeffrey Saviano4-6, 3-6
2022-05-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Townsley / Colin O'Higgins vs Liam Ryan / Colton Bradford2-6, 5-7
2022-05-05vs Quail West - C. HayesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Townsley / Ryan Kinser vs Charles Hayes / Rob Fox6-4, 6-4
2022-04-28vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Christie / Daniel Becker vs James Ray / Brock Wilson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Townsley / Bobby Marks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-21vs Cambier - D. PackoWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Christie / Shane Lefebvre vs Zoltan Seles / Tyler Wood6-0, 7-5
2022-04-18vs Pelican Bay Park - JuanWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Townsley / Colin O'Higgins vs David Jelinek / Jaime Weisinger6-2, 2-3
2022-03-31vs Cambier - HirschWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Townsley / Colin O'Higgins vs Isaac Codrey / Michael Schrock6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesPaul Christie vs Gavin Szoka1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Townsley / Colin O'Higgins vs William Kimmel / Chris Gold6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Shane Lefebvre
published
3.85
Bobby Marks
published 4
3.85
Chris Marchand
published 4
3.79
Ben Brown
published 4
Charles Klass
published 4
3.75
George Anderson
published 4
3.74
Colin O'Higgins
published 4
3.55
David Townsley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.51
Brian Bonacci
published 4
Joe Pisto
published
Paul Christie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Townsley + Paul Christie213 matchesnot enough data
David Townsley + Colin O'Higgins213 matchesnot enough data
Shane Lefebvre + Chris Marchand213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane Lefebvre
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Bobby Marks
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Chris Marchand
18W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Ben Brown
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Charles Klass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
George Anderson
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Colin O'Higgins
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
David Townsley
103W–79L career · 7 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Brian Bonacci
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Joe Pisto
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Christie
79W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.