Teams

Haley/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-13vs Cooner/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Bissell / Kendall Morehart vs Amy Juneau / Susan Jorden7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele' Swanson / Tiphanie Maxwell vs Amy Knotts / Marie Smith6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmanda Urian / Jessica Davis vs Sumer Cooner / Jennifer Sartin6-2, 6-1
2025-08-07vs Benton/18/WN/3-3.5-4.0/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Benton / Holly Bissell vs Lyndsey Chandler / Crissy Burchett6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Souter / Christi White vs Valarie Thiels / Mary Ward2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Urian / Sandra Haley vs Wendy Reynolds / Megan Hunt7-5, 4-4
2025-07-30vs Watters/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristy Gonzalez / Kendall Morehart vs Karyn Triche / Meg Frazier1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShinyoung You / Tiphanie Maxwell vs Lizzy Stroud Moore / Mandi Little6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCourtney Bouillon / Jessica Davis vs Kristen Watters / Amanda Dickson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-21vs Fulco/18/WN/3-3.5-4/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Bissell / Jennifer Sheffield vs Catherine Simonton / Laura Frierson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristy Gonzalez / Michele' Swanson vs Sarah Hatfield / Julia Bryn1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Urian / Sandra Haley vs Sarah Young / Abby Granger6-1, 6-4
2025-07-09vs Hood/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Benton / Jennifer Sheffield vs Amanda Gulley / JoAnna B Haynes7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele' Swanson / Alex Souter vs Jodi Marvin / Emily Walker0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Bouillon / Jessica Davis vs Brin Hammond / Michelle Darby6-3, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Griffin/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Benton / Christi White vs Parisa Zamani / Toni Goodin6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristy Gonzalez / Shinyoung You vs Amanda Teague / Madeline Slack5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Davis / Sandra Haley vs Heather Floyd / Chris Dunn6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hand/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/CTC5112616159
2Haley/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC5112617150
3Douglas/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC4212612135
4Thiels-Ward/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC4210817155
5Watters/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC3311716134
6Mitchell-Sella/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC3310819158
7Hood/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC339919157
8Bryn/Hatfield/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCC2481022178
9Matheny/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCC2471125175
10Griffin/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC1541429195
11Cooner/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC1541429206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Kathy Benton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Jennifer Sheffield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Holly Bissell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Christy Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Tiphanie Maxwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Amanda Urian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Alex Souter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
HOLLY ELLIS
published 3
2.71
Christi White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Courtney Bouillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Michele' Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Sandra Haley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kendall Morehart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shinyoung You
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Haley + Amanda Urian6174% games+20.4% vs expected
Holly Bissell + Christy Gonzalez3642% games−5.5% vs expected
Christy Gonzalez + Christi White4352% games−9.8% vs expected
Holly Bissell + Kendall Morehart213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Benton
52W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Jennifer Sheffield
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Holly Bissell
18W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Christy Gonzalez
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Tiphanie Maxwell
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Amanda Urian
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Alex Souter
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
HOLLY ELLIS
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christi White
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Courtney Bouillon
24W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Michele' Swanson
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Sandra Haley
28W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Kendall Morehart
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shinyoung You
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.