Teams

Watters/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev

21 players · average NTRP 3.08 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs Mitchell-Green/18/WN/3-3.5-4/POTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesHallie McHalffey / Mandi Little vs Caroline Landon / Heather Duke2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Haynie / Mary-Frances Haynes vs Kristen Sepulvado / Brianna Gordon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-30vs Haley/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesLizzy Stroud Moore / Mandi Little vs Shinyoung You / Tiphanie Maxwell1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Watters / Amanda Dickson vs Courtney Bouillon / Jessica Davis1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-23vs Bryn/Hatfield/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLizzy Stroud Moore / Lindsay Stuart vs Heidi Kallenberg / Lauren Hubble2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Bunnett / Meredith Evans vs Haley Hall / Kate Patty6-0, 6-3
2025-07-16vs Bihm/18/WN/3-3.5-4.0/QTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesMandi Little / Lindsay Stuart vs Lesley Harter / Shelly Fielder0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary-Frances Haynes / Amanda Haynie vs Brin Hammond / Abbie Waxham6-2, 6-2
2025-07-09vs Griffin/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary-Frances Haynes / Lindsay Stuart vs Ally Howerter / Holli Griffin6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Watters / Amanda Haynie vs Erica McCain / Alison Luttkus6-3, 6-2
2025-07-02vs Matheny/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Overdyke / Lindsay Stuart vs Jocelyn Hooper / Angie Wray2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hand/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/CTC5112616159
2Haley/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC5112617150
3Douglas/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC4212612135
4Thiels-Ward/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC4210817155
5Watters/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC3311716134
6Mitchell-Sella/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC3310819158
7Hood/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC339919157
8Bryn/Hatfield/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCC2481022178
9Matheny/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCC2471125175
10Griffin/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC1541429195
11Cooner/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC1541429206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Meg Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Mary Catherine Kneip
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Megan Stuermann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Leigh Flood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Emily Overdyke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Karyn Triche
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Trisha Q-Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Mary-Frances Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Shani Crawford
published
2.90
Jane Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Emily Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Laura Love
published
Hallie McHalffey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Mandi Little
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Lindsay Stuart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Amanda Haynie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Meredith Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Lizzy Stroud Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Amanda Bunnett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Kristen Watters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Amanda Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Watters + Amanda Bunnett5455% games+7.2% vs expected
Amanda Haynie + Meredith Evans4252% games+6.3% vs expected
Karyn Triche + Meg Frazier17561% games+5.9% vs expected
Kristen Watters + Amanda Haynie4647% games−1.4% vs expected
Meredith Evans + Mary-Frances Haynes4256% games−1.5% vs expected
Shani Crawford + Laura Love7256% games−1.5% vs expected
Laura Love + Emily Dickson3550% games−9.2% vs expected
Lindsay Stuart + Mandi Little314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Frazier
64W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Mary Catherine Kneip
19W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Megan Stuermann
39W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Leigh Flood
49W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Emily Overdyke
52W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Karyn Triche
47W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Trisha Q-Petersen
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
3.06
Mary-Frances Haynes
60W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Shani Crawford
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jane Dickson
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Emily Dickson
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Laura Love
25W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Hallie McHalffey
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mandi Little
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Lindsay Stuart
23W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Amanda Haynie
35W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Meredith Evans
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Lizzy Stroud Moore
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.59
3
Amanda Bunnett
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Kristen Watters
29W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.48
3
Amanda Dickson
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.