Teams

Cooner/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-13vs Haley/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Juneau / Susan Jorden vs Holly Bissell / Kendall Morehart6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Knotts / Marie Smith vs Michele' Swanson / Tiphanie Maxwell4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSumer Cooner / Jennifer Sartin vs Amanda Urian / Jessica Davis2-6, 1-6
2025-07-30vs Hood/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Juneau / Amy Knotts vs Donielle Wynn / Kelly Woodard2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaeiron Saunders / Cheryl Wagg vs Beverly Hood / Emily Walker5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKay Holland / Judy Rose vs Erin Fraser / Abbie Waxham3-6, 3-6
2025-07-23vs Griffin/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesEne Wang / Amy Juneau vs Parisa Zamani / Tammy Rhodes6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Jorden / Sumer Cooner vs Ally Howerter / Amanda Teague2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaeiron Saunders / Chasity Maylon vs Chris Dunn / Heather Floyd2-6, 4-6
2025-07-16vs Matheny/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarie Smith / Cheryl Wagg vs Alisa Cotton / Angie Wray1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRachal Bryan / Jennifer Sartin vs Gail Brown / Morgan VanZandt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-09vs Thiels-Ward/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Wagg / Ene Wang vs Rachael Deere / Lyndsey Chandler3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaeiron Saunders / Gulya Chandler vs Valarie Thiels / Denise Reynolds4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Rose / Kay Holland vs Jacqueline Gibson / Kaitlin Wood7-6, 7-6
2025-07-02vs Douglas/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Knotts / Susan Jorden vs Jenny Rodgers / Katherine Roberts3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Smith / Cheryl Wagg vs Cindy Courtney / Angela Pfanner4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChasity Maylon / Rachal Bryan vs Lyndzee McConathy / Rose Whittington6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hand/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/CTC5112616159
2Haley/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC5112617150
3Douglas/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC4212612135
4Thiels-Ward/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC4210817155
5Watters/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC3311716134
6Mitchell-Sella/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/POTC3310819158
7Hood/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/BTC339919157
8Bryn/Hatfield/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCC2481022178
9Matheny/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/STCC2471125175
10Griffin/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC1541429195
11Cooner/18/WN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC1541429206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Ene Wang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Kaeiron Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Amy Juneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Amy Knotts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Kay Holland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Susan Jorden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Gulya Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Cheryl Wagg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Rachal Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Judy Rose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Chasity Maylon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Jennifer Sartin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sumer Cooner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Sartin + Chasity Maylon1438% games−0.2% vs expected
Kay Holland + Judy Rose71044% games−1.4% vs expected
Cheryl Wagg + Kaeiron Saunders2542% games−2.5% vs expected
Jennifer Sartin + Sumer Cooner1431% games−4.0% vs expected
Cheryl Wagg + Rachal Bryan134 matchesnot enough data
Rachal Bryan + Chasity Maylon044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Knotts + Sumer Cooner123 matchesnot enough data
Rachal Bryan + Jennifer Sartin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ene Wang
72W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Kaeiron Saunders
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Amy Juneau
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Amy Knotts
26W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Kay Holland
20W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Susan Jorden
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Gulya Chandler
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Cheryl Wagg
12W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Rachal Bryan
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Judy Rose
34W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Chasity Maylon
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Jennifer Sartin
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30
Sumer Cooner
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.