Teams

APurmort (Queens)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs KGissy (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Lauren Smith0-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAllison Purmort vs Vanessa Lowery4-6, 1-6
2025-07-16vs KHarborne (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKara Tringali vs Jenny Wilken6-0, 6-3
2025-07-08vs BBaker (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Miars vs Brittany Baker6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesWhitney Feld vs Kathy Kopec2-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs LPinzon/LDifazio (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAllison Purmort vs Lori DiFazio1-4
2025-06-18vs KMoore (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Brittany Julian3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-11vs MGross (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKara Tringali vs Annabel Chen4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Purmort vs Jessica Bradford1-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs EKennard (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAllison Purmort vs Margaret Cart3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Lillie Hicks3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Elizabeth Miars
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Lauren Spanos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.95
Kara Tringali
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
Allison Purmort
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.76
Virginia Wooten
published
Whitney Feld
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Tringali + Allison Purmort161156% games−0.9% vs expected
Allison Purmort + Lauren Spanos9654% gamesnot enough data
Kara Tringali + Lauren Spanos213 matchesnot enough data
Allison Purmort + Virginia Wooten123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Miars
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Lauren Spanos
35W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Kara Tringali
75W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Allison Purmort
58W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Virginia Wooten
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Whitney Feld
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.