Teams

FTA18A/Riverside/Pompey

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs FTA18A/HollyTree/NowellLost 14
L#1 DoublesLindsay Stevens / Sandra Shillington-Lopez vs Lisa Littleton / Shelly James0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristina Pompey vs Laura Nowell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLucy Austin / Barbara Stewart Zinkovich vs Madina Cauthen / Claudia Kornaros4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKim Barrs vs Blair Brading2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan MacEr / Xiaoqing Yang vs Kimberly Alber / Ann Brodie1-6, 0-6
2025-03-09vs FTA18A/Riverwalk/PowersWon 32
W#1 DoublesKim Dailey / Elizabeth Hood vs Rachael Cariveau / Gloria Bleasdale6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristina Pompey vs Olga Paz5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Hayes / Lindsay Stevens vs Roberta Zoppe / Jessica McMullen6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCristina Torres vs Meg Powers5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBarbara Stewart Zinkovich / Sandra Shillington-Lopez vs Lauren Young / Janna Neil6-0, 6-1
2025-03-02vs FTA18A/NeelyFarms/WiseLost 14
L#1 DoublesLindsay Stevens / Christina Pompey vs Jordan Wise / Brie Soler1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKim Dailey vs Leigh Wolke3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Barrs / Rachel Hayes vs Mary Beth Campbell / Lauren Nelson6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesXiaoqing Yang vs Teresa Fox1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Stewart Zinkovich / Lucy Austin vs Sydney Fowler / Caroline Perkins6-4, 6-4
2025-02-23vs FTA18A/SpauldingFarm/HillLost 05
L#1 DoublesKim Barrs / Cristina Torres vs Patricia Surles / Holly Chittenden0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKim Dailey vs Cindy Hradec2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLucy Austin / Susan MacEr vs Tracy Chastain / Blair Zeimetz0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesXiaoqing Yang vs Gina Pelino6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Hayes / Elizabeth Hood vs Tracey MacDonald / Debbie Hultquist2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Kim Dailey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Christina Pompey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Elizabeth Hood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Sandra Shillington-Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Xiaoqing Yang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Lucy Austin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Rachel Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Cristina Torres
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.32
Lindsay Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Kim Barrs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.01
Susan MacEr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Torres + Kim Barrs6742% games−5.6% vs expected
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich + Lucy Austin3252% gamesnot enough data
Xiaoqing Yang + Rachel Hayes314 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich + Sandra Shillington-Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Christina Pompey + Lindsay Stevens213 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Austin + Rachel Hayes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Dailey
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich
10W–7L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Christina Pompey
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Elizabeth Hood
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Sandra Shillington-Lopez
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Xiaoqing Yang
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Lucy Austin
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Rachel Hayes
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.53
2.5
Cristina Torres
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Lindsay Stevens
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Kim Barrs
9W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Susan MacEr
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.