Teams

FTA18A/HollyTree/Nowell

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-27vs FTA18A/SpauldingFarm/HillLost 23
L#1 DoublesShelly James / Claudia Kornaros vs Patricia Surles / Holly Chittenden2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelanie Armstrong vs Natalie Ruggiero4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSuzy Clary / Tabitha Taylor vs Stephanie Gray / Courtney Bosh2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLara Knight vs Joanne Cruickshank6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Alber / Arden Foster vs Debbie Hultquist / Tracey Hoffert4-5
2025-04-13vs FTA18A/Riverside/PompeyWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Littleton / Shelly James vs Lindsay Stevens / Sandra Shillington-Lopez6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLaura Nowell vs Christina Pompey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Claudia Kornaros vs Lucy Austin / Barbara Stewart Zinkovich6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBlair Brading vs Kim Barrs6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Alber / Ann Brodie vs Susan MacEr / Xiaoqing Yang6-1, 6-0
2025-04-10vs FTA18A/GCC/HughesLost 23
L#1 DoublesClaudia Kornaros / Ann Brodie vs Joanna Bragdon / Kasey Frank6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Nowell vs Kaitlyn Seaver4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLara Knight / Lora Henderson vs Katherine Davis / Suzanne Massey Schemm6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMelanie Armstrong vs Nicki Creech6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTabitha Taylor / Alicia Walters vs Jennifer Coleman / Kristen McLean6-2, 6-2
2025-03-09vs FTA18A/Cardinal/MattinglyWon 32
L#1 DoublesSuzy Clary / Lora Henderson vs Tracey Nettles / Sandi Tolly5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMelanie Armstrong vs Claire Maybin6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlicia Walters / Lara Knight vs Catherine Murry / Jessica Heller3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTabitha Taylor vs Sheila Voigt6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Alber / Arden Foster vs Rebecca Mazzone / Paola White6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-23vs FTA18A/NeelyFarms/WiseWon 32
L#1 DoublesLisa Littleton / Shelly James vs Leigh Wolke / Elizabeth Raduns0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Nowell vs Jordan Wise6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTabitha Taylor / Madina Cauthen vs Liz Taylor / Malinda Griffin6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLara Knight vs Brie Soler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Armstrong / Ann Brodie vs Sabrina Davidson / Mary Beth Campbell6-4, 6-1
2025-02-09vs FTA18A/Riverwalk/PowersWon 41
L#1 DoublesLisa Littleton / Shelly James vs JB Robinson / Cady Johnson1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Nowell vs Olga Paz6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesArden Foster / Kimberly Alber vs Beth Anne Eads / Melanie Pickhardt6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLara Knight vs Meg Powers6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnn Brodie / Melanie Armstrong vs Michelle Callahan / Jessica McMullen6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Blair Brading
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.89
Lara Knight
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Ann Brodie
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Suzy Clary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Lora Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Claudia Kornaros
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Alicia Walters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Arden Foster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Tabitha Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.65
Melanie Armstrong
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Lisa Littleton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Shelly James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Madina Cauthen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Diane Zeager
published 3
2.36
Kimberly Alber
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Laura Nowell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Knight + Claudia Kornaros4258% games+9.8% vs expected
Lara Knight + Lora Henderson91548% games+6.7% vs expected
Claudia Kornaros + Lora Henderson121151% games+2.5% vs expected
Alicia Walters + Blair Brading7256% games+2.0% vs expected
Shelly James + Claudia Kornaros8753% games+1.9% vs expected
Melanie Armstrong + Ann Brodie7453% games−1.4% vs expected
Madina Cauthen + Shelly James1627% games−3.9% vs expected
Claudia Kornaros + Ann Brodie2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Blair Brading
29W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Lara Knight
57W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
3
Ann Brodie
20W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Suzy Clary
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Lora Henderson
59W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.84
3
Claudia Kornaros
57W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Alicia Walters
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Arden Foster
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tabitha Taylor
15W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Melanie Armstrong
16W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Lisa Littleton
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Shelly James
29W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Madina Cauthen
33W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Diane Zeager
12W–23L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
Kimberly Alber
16W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Laura Nowell
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.