Teams

FTA18A/SpauldingFarm/Hill

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-27vs FTA18A/HollyTree/NowellWon 32
W#1 DoublesPatricia Surles / Holly Chittenden vs Shelly James / Claudia Kornaros6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNatalie Ruggiero vs Melanie Armstrong6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Gray / Courtney Bosh vs Suzy Clary / Tabitha Taylor6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJoanne Cruickshank vs Lara Knight2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Hultquist / Tracey Hoffert vs Kimberly Alber / Arden Foster5-4
2025-04-13vs FTA18A/GCC/HughesWon 41
L#1 DoublesHolly Chittenden / Tracy Chastain vs Joanna Bragdon / Suzanne Massey Schemm3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Hradec vs Katherine Davis6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Surles / Blair Zeimetz vs Barbara Merline / Nicki Creech6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTracey MacDonald vs Kasey Frank7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoanne Cruickshank / Gina Pelino vs Barbara Robertson / Catherine Webb6-1, 6-3
2025-04-06vs FTA18A/Cardinal/MattinglyWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristen Guilfoos / Mara Townsend vs Tracey Nettles / Sandi Tolly2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Hradec vs Kellar Rogers5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBlair Zeimetz / Natalie Ruggiero vs Carol Shrum / Jessica Heller6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSherri Daniel vs Stephanie Harrelson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Hultquist / Tracey MacDonald vs Paola White / Wendy LaRose6-1, 6-1
2025-03-30vs FTA18A/Riverwalk/PowersWon 50
W#1 DoublesPatricia Surles / Joanne Cruickshank vs Cady Johnson / Beth Anne Eads6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCindy Hradec vs Jessa Shiner6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Guilfoos / Courtney Bosh vs Rachael Cariveau / Michelle Callahan6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSherri Daniel vs Roberta Zoppe6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTracey Hoffert / Angie Hill vs Jessica McMullen / Gloria Bleasdale3-5
2025-03-09vs FTA18A/NeelyFarms/WiseWon 32
W#1 DoublesPatricia Surles / Holly Chittenden vs Leigh Wolke / Teresa Fox7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSherri Daniel vs Elizabeth Raduns6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Gray / Mara Townsend vs Mary Beth Campbell / Caroline Perkins6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesNatalie Ruggiero vs Jordan Wise6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngie Hill / Debbie Hultquist vs Sabrina Davidson / Sydney Fowler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-23vs FTA18A/Riverside/PompeyWon 50
W#1 DoublesPatricia Surles / Holly Chittenden vs Kim Barrs / Cristina Torres6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCindy Hradec vs Kim Dailey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTracy Chastain / Blair Zeimetz vs Lucy Austin / Susan MacEr6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGina Pelino vs Xiaoqing Yang4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracey MacDonald / Debbie Hultquist vs Rachel Hayes / Elizabeth Hood6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Patricia Surles
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Holly Chittenden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Cindy Hradec
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.92
Debbie Hultquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Blair Zeimetz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Tracy Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Natalie Ruggiero
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Mara Townsend
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Joanne Cruickshank
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Gina Pelino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Sherri Daniel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Courtney Bosh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Tracey MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Kristen Guilfoos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tracey Hoffert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Chittenden + Patricia Surles11463% games+8.3% vs expected
Joanne Cruickshank + Patricia Surles6267% games+5.3% vs expected
Natalie Ruggiero + Cindy Hradec4257% games+0.2% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Natalie Ruggiero4544% games−3.5% vs expected
Tracey MacDonald + Cindy Hradec4253% games−4.6% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Patricia Surles6071% gamesnot enough data
Gina Pelino + Joanne Cruickshank224 matchesnot enough data
Blair Zeimetz + Tracy Chastain303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Surles
63W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Holly Chittenden
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Cindy Hradec
49W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Debbie Hultquist
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Blair Zeimetz
46W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Tracy Chastain
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Natalie Ruggiero
42W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Mara Townsend
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Joanne Cruickshank
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gina Pelino
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Sherri Daniel
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Courtney Bosh
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey MacDonald
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Kristen Guilfoos
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Hoffert
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.