Teams

FTA18A/Cardinal/Mattingly

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs FTA18A/Riverwalk/PowersLost 14
L#1 DoublesChimene Evans / Tracey Nettles vs Gloria Bleasdale / Beth Anne Eads6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesClaire Maybin vs Melanie Pickhardt7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Mazzone / Stephanie Harrelson vs Rachael Cariveau / Cady Johnson6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPaola White vs Jessa Shiner6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMimi Cooley / Sheila Voigt vs Roberta Zoppe / Lauren Young4-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs FTA18A/NeelyFarms/WiseWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracey Nettles / Sandi Tolly vs Jordan Wise / Elizabeth Raduns3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKellar Rogers vs Teresa Fox6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaire Maybin / Jessica Heller vs Emily Strickland / Ruth Tucker1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-06vs FTA18A/SpauldingFarm/HillLost 23
W#1 DoublesTracey Nettles / Sandi Tolly vs Kristen Guilfoos / Mara Townsend6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKellar Rogers vs Cindy Hradec7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Shrum / Jessica Heller vs Blair Zeimetz / Natalie Ruggiero4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesStephanie Harrelson vs Sherri Daniel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaola White / Wendy LaRose vs Debbie Hultquist / Tracey MacDonald1-6, 1-6
2025-03-09vs FTA18A/HollyTree/NowellLost 23
W#1 DoublesTracey Nettles / Sandi Tolly vs Suzy Clary / Lora Henderson7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesClaire Maybin vs Melanie Armstrong3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Murry / Jessica Heller vs Alicia Walters / Lara Knight6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSheila Voigt vs Tabitha Taylor1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Mazzone / Paola White vs Kimberly Alber / Arden Foster3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Kellar Rogers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Sandi Tolly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Tracey Nettles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Jessica Heller
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Carol Shrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Catherine Murry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Claire Maybin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Chimene Evans
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Wendy LaRose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Rebecca Mazzone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Paola White
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Stephanie Harrelson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Valerie Mattingly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Sheila Voigt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.26
Mimi Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Johnel Searcy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Nettles + Sandi Tolly4362% games+4.8% vs expected
Paola White + Valerie Mattingly3447% games+2.0% vs expected
Rebecca Mazzone + Wendy LaRose3646% games−3.8% vs expected
Catherine Murry + Tracey Nettles0527% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Mazzone + Mimi Cooley134 matchesnot enough data
Kellar Rogers + Wendy LaRose134 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Heller + Claire Maybin213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Mazzone + Chimene Evans123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kellar Rogers
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Sandi Tolly
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Tracey Nettles
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Jessica Heller
10W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Carol Shrum
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Catherine Murry
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Claire Maybin
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Chimene Evans
21W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Wendy LaRose
8W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Rebecca Mazzone
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Paola White
11W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Stephanie Harrelson
2W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Valerie Mattingly
9W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Sheila Voigt
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Mimi Cooley
10W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Johnel Searcy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.