Teams

FTA18A/GCC/Hughes

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs FTA18A/SpauldingFarm/HillLost 13
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Suzanne Massey Schemm vs Holly Chittenden / Tracy Chastain6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Merline / Nicki Creech vs Patricia Surles / Blair Zeimetz0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKasey Frank vs Tracey MacDonald7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Robertson / Catherine Webb vs Joanne Cruickshank / Gina Pelino1-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs FTA18A/HollyTree/NowellWon 32
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Kasey Frank vs Claudia Kornaros / Ann Brodie2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Seaver vs Laura Nowell6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Davis / Suzanne Massey Schemm vs Lara Knight / Lora Henderson7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesNicki Creech vs Melanie Armstrong3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Coleman / Kristen McLean vs Tabitha Taylor / Alicia Walters2-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs FTA18A/Riverwalk/PowersWon 32
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Suzanne Massey Schemm vs Beth Anne Eads / Michelle Callahan6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCatherine Webb vs Olga Paz6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKasey Frank / Carrie Marguet vs Rachael Cariveau / Cady Johnson6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesVictoria Robinson vs Meg Powers3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristen McLean / Velda Hughes vs Roberta Zoppe / Janna Neil2-6, 4-6
2025-02-09vs FTA18A/NeelyFarms/WiseLost 23
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Suzanne Massey Schemm vs Teresa Fox / Caroline Perkins6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichele Johnson vs Jordan Wise0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Coleman / Allison Ko vs Lauren Nelson / Mary Beth Campbell2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTeresa Webster vs Elizabeth Raduns2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKasey Frank / Carrie Marguet vs Sabrina Davidson / Sydney Fowler7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Joanna Bragdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Suzanne Massey Schemm
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Kaitlyn Seaver
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Catherine Webb
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Nicki Creech
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Carrie Marguet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Barbara Merline
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Michelle Seaver
published
2.49
Kasey Frank
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.28
Christie Nachman
published 2.5
Barbara Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Victoria Robinson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.21
Velda Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Kristen McLean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Virginia Hayes
published
2.05
Teresa Webster
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jennifer Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Johnson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasey Frank + Carrie Marguet3347% games−2.9% vs expected
Virginia Hayes + Kristen McLean1436% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Coleman + Kristen McLean044 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Marguet + Catherine Webb134 matchesnot enough data
Joanna Bragdon + Suzanne Massey Schemm314 matchesnot enough data
Kasey Frank + Victoria Robinson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanna Bragdon
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Suzanne Massey Schemm
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kaitlyn Seaver
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Catherine Webb
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Nicki Creech
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Carrie Marguet
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Barbara Merline
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Michelle Seaver
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kasey Frank
11W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Christie Nachman
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Barbara Robertson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Robinson
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.25
Velda Hughes
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.21
Kristen McLean
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Virginia Hayes
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Teresa Webster
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jennifer Coleman
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Johnson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.