Teams

CLC:TBD:Speranza

2021 ME Tri Level · Men's 4.0 South 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-05vs RFC:TBD:GraceffaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Swall / Jack Speranza vs Harper Chalat / Joe Messerman2-6, 2-6
2021-11-14vs RFC:TBD:PickeringWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Swall / Jack Speranza vs Richard Pickering / Mark Woodbury7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-31vs RFC:TBD:PickeringLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Swall / John Scofield vs Mark Woodbury / Richard Pickering7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-31vs RFC:TBD:MagantiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Swall / Jack Speranza vs Taylor Krowitz / Chris Bowring4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-03vs RFC:TBD:GraceffaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid DeCamp / Jonathan Swall vs Joshua Graceffa / Caleb Richard2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 South 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
John Scofield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
David DeCamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Jack Speranza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jonathan Swall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Scofield + Jack Speranza91147% games+7.9% vs expected
Jonathan Swall + John Scofield2353% games+7.7% vs expected
Jonathan Swall + Jack Speranza4346% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Scofield
60W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
David DeCamp
8W–10L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Jack Speranza
72W–143L career · 9 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Jonathan Swall
11W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.