Teams

RFC:TBD:Pickering

2021 ME Tri Level · Men's 4.0 South 1

2 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-05vs RFC:TBD:MagantiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Woodbury / Richard Pickering vs Patrick Casey / Chris Bowring7-6, 6-3
2021-11-14vs CLC:TBD:SperanzaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Pickering / Mark Woodbury vs Jonathan Swall / Jack Speranza5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-10-31vs RFC:TBD:GraceffaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Woodbury / Richard Pickering vs Harper Chalat / Joe Messerman3-6, 4-6
2021-10-31vs CLC:TBD:SperanzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Woodbury / Richard Pickering vs Jonathan Swall / John Scofield7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-12vs RFC:TBD:GraceffaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Woodbury / Richard Pickering vs Harper Chalat / Joe Messerman3-6, 1-6
2021-10-03vs RFC:TBD:MagantiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Woodbury / Richard Pickering vs Patrick Casey / Taylor Krowitz6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men's 4.0 South 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TBD:Graceffa5151242
2RFC:TBD:Pickering3333762

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Richard Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Mark Woodbury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Pickering + Mark Woodbury8652% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Pickering
89W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Mark Woodbury
72W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.