Teams

RFC:TBD:Graceffa

2021 ME Tri Level · Men 3.5 South 1

2 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-12-05vs RFC:TBD:MagantiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Messerman / Joshua Graceffa vs Patrick Casey / Chris Bowring6-4, 6-4
2021-12-05vs CLC:TBD:SperanzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarper Chalat / Joe Messerman vs Jonathan Swall / Jack Speranza6-2, 6-2
2021-12-04vs RFC:MainelyMental:HardyLost 01
L#1 DoublesHarper Chalat / Joshua Graceffa vs John Cannon / Scott Hardy5-5
2021-11-14vs RFC:TBD:ChadbourneWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Marc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-06vs RFC:TBD:ManuelWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Michel Manuel / James White6-2, 6-1
2021-10-31vs RFC:TBD:PickeringWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarper Chalat / Joe Messerman vs Mark Woodbury / Richard Pickering6-3, 6-4
2021-10-30vs RFC:TBD:ChadbourneWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Sean Dundon / H Terence Hampson6-3, 6-0
2021-10-12vs RFC:TBD:PickeringWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarper Chalat / Joe Messerman vs Mark Woodbury / Richard Pickering6-3, 6-1
2021-10-03vs CLC:TBD:SperanzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Caleb Richard vs David DeCamp / Jonathan Swall6-2, 6-4
2021-10-02vs RFC:MainelyMental:HardyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Scott Hardy / Michael Samson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-02vs RFC:TBD:BowringWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Chris Bowring / Steven Buxton6-2, 6-4
2021-09-18vs RFC:TBD:BowringWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Jerome Faure / Chris Bowring6-2, 6-3
2021-09-18vs RFC:TBD:ManuelWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat vs Minh Nguyen / Michel Manuel6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.5 South 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TBD:Graceffa5151242
2RFC:TBD:Pickering3333762

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Harper Chalat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Joshua Graceffa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harper Chalat + Joshua Graceffa261159% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harper Chalat
81W–46L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Joshua Graceffa
114W–93L career · 10 lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.