Teams

DTC #1

2025 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-28vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaurice Silva / Michael Garvin vs Stephen Newell / PEPITO RONQUILLO2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Feast / Timothy Havasi vs Abdiel Yamomo / Alfredo Sabillo6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Nigel White vs Charles Jones / Reynaldo Braganza6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-21vs SPANISH OAKSLost 12
W#1 DoublesTimothy Havasi / Michael Garvin vs Dino Mendicino / Rick Holden6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Feast / Craig Slayter vs Kent Roesner / KRISTON QUALLS6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesThomas Waite / Nigel White vs Absalom Alcaraz / Scott Paull2-6, 3-6
2025-03-07vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Havasi / Maurice Silva vs Edgar Rizarri / Jim Roulias1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Garvin / Bruce Hansen vs Robert Roig / Alfredo Sabillo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Waite / Sandy Mann vs PEPITO RONQUILLO / Jabo Tang2-6, 4-6
2025-02-28vs SPANISH OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Hansen / Maurice Silva vs George Mulopulos / Steven McCrary1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Waite / Michael Garvin vs KRISTON QUALLS / Kent Roesner2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Mann / William Feast vs Gary Miller / Absalom Alcaraz4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-14vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Timothy Havasi vs Robert Roig / Ted Dela Cruz1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Hansen / Maurice Silva vs Abdiel Yamomo / Jabo Tang7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Garvin / Sandy Mann vs Edgar Rizarri / Jim Roulias2-6, 0-6
2025-01-31vs SPANISH OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Garvin / Maurice Silva vs Absalom Alcaraz / Scott Paull3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Hansen / Sandy Mann vs Rick Holden / Kent Roesner4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Steven McCrary / Gary Miller3-6, 0-6
2025-01-24vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Bruce Hansen vs Robert Roig / Ted Dela Cruz1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Mann / Michael Garvin vs Charles Jones / Michael Villani2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTimothy Havasi / Craig Slayter vs Reynaldo Braganza / Abdiel Yamomo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-17vs SPANISH OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Hansen / Michael Garvin vs George Mulopulos / Steven McCrary1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaurice Silva / Timothy Havasi vs Kent Roesner / KRISTON QUALLS2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Absalom Alcaraz / Dino Mendicino3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Nigel White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
William Feast
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Craig Slayter
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.73
Sandy Mann
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Thomas Waite
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Maurice Silva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Michael Garvin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Timothy Havasi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Slayter + Nigel White2844% games+4.1% vs expected
Sandy Mann + Nigel White91148% games+1.8% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Sandy Mann72337% games−5.4% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Nigel White2637% games−5.8% vs expected
Sandy Mann + William Feast11636% games−6.6% vs expected
Maurice Silva + Sandy Mann21237% games−7.0% vs expected
Thomas Waite + William Feast41344% games−7.4% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Craig Slayter41937% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Hansen
3W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Nigel White
41W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
William Feast
58W–182L career · 5 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Craig Slayter
103W–194L career · 5 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.87
Sandy Mann
36W–140L career · 5 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.73
Thomas Waite
41W–133L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Maurice Silva
50W–174L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Michael Garvin
14W–55L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Havasi
20W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.