Teams

Liberty Park-ZenMaxxers

2026 3.0 · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-20vs Sports Mall-Vos/IsazaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDang Quach / Van Vu vs Garrett Peck / Nicholas Ujifusa1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSpencer Grabow / Brenden van Berkum vs Michael Isaza / Edward Ekstrom4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKurt Walck / Calvin Woffinden vs Ryan Farr / Matt Farr6-1, 6-2
2026-08-13vs New Daddy’sWon 21
L#1 DoublesIsaac Lee / Zach Harris vs Ryan Fyfe / Hudson Martin0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrenden van Berkum / Mike Evanko vs Dylan Richardson / Hall Humphrey7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCalvin Woffinden / Jack Pendergast vs Tomas Barrera / John Pylidis6-1, 6-4
2026-08-06vs Loose Grip GangLost 03
L#1 DoublesDang Quach / Isaac Lee vs Remi Barron / Quinn Pritchett2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSpencer Grabow / Brenden van Berkum vs Matthew Bordbari / Matt Downing4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCalvin Woffinden / Jack Pendergast vs Russell Hermansen / Jon Reed4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-30vs Liberty Park-Wright/HarnicherLost 12
L#1 DoublesDang Quach / Zach Harris vs Kasen Wright / Colby Pomeroy1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenden van Berkum / Mike Evanko vs Naga Bhargav Paritala / Ted Staros5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCalvin Woffinden / Kurt Walck vs Nick Arismendi / Yoonsung Goo2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-16vs Liberty Park-Vorasane/FongWon 20
W#1 DoublesVan Vu / Zach Harris vs Michael Perez / Andrew Bliss6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCalvin Woffinden / Kurt Walck vs Ryan Lowe / Phu Ly6-3, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Sports Mall DKSportsWon 30
W#1 DoublesZach Harris / Dang Quach vs Carlos Hernandez / Jack Taylor4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenden van Berkum / Mike Evanko vs David Rozsa / Matt Rupert6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJack Pendergast / Jordan Parker vs Kale Thompson / Cameron Fuhriman7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza5011414134
2Liberty Park-Wright/Harnicher5113512122
3Liberty Park-ZenMaxxers329614129
4Loose Grip Gang3310819165
5New Daddy’s249919158
6Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong1551328206
7Sports Mall DKSports1531531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Dang Quach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Isaac Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Van Vu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Mike Evanko
published 3.5
3.11
Calvin Woffinden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.09
Brenden van Berkum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Kurt Walck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jack Pendergast
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Jordan Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zach Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Pendergast + Calvin Woffinden7274% games+16.9% vs expected
Mike Evanko + Brenden van Berkum6355% games+3.2% vs expected
Calvin Woffinden + Kurt Walck404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dang Quach
58W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Isaac Lee
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Van Vu
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Mike Evanko
11W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
3
Calvin Woffinden
24W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.11
3.5
Brenden van Berkum
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Kurt Walck
28W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Jack Pendergast
36W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Jordan Parker
6W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.84
Zach Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.