Teams

Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza

2026 3.0 · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.61 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-20vs Liberty Park-ZenMaxxersLost 12
L#1 DoublesGarrett Peck / Nicholas Ujifusa vs Dang Quach / Van Vu6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Isaza / Edward Ekstrom vs Spencer Grabow / Brenden van Berkum6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRyan Farr / Matt Farr vs Kurt Walck / Calvin Woffinden1-6, 2-6
2026-08-13vs Liberty Park-Vorasane/FongWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Isaza / Colton Kasteler vs Ryan Lowe / Andrew Bliss4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Chase / Ryan Farr vs Phu Ly / Jeffrey Vai7-5, 6-0
2026-08-06vs Sports Mall DKSportsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEdward Ekstrom / Michael Olson vs Brant Barney / Cameron Fuhriman6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTeren Taniuchi / Matt Farr vs Matt Rupert / Kale Thompson3-6, 6-7
2026-07-18vs New Daddy’sSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGabriel Tapia / Colton Kasteler vs Conner Smith / Marty Pye2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Chase / James Crafa vs Tomas Barrera / Cole Benedict3-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs Loose Grip GangWon 20
W#2 DoublesGabriel Tapia / Michael Olson vs Jake Glassman / Jess Curtis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Chase / Matt Farr vs Russell Hermansen / Jason Struletz6-4, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Liberty Park-Wright/HarnicherSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Chase / James Crafa vs Tyler Findlay / Nguyen Thai0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGabriel Tapia / Edward Ekstrom vs Thomas Good / Max Harnicher7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza5011414134
2Liberty Park-Wright/Harnicher5113512122
3Liberty Park-ZenMaxxers329614129
4Loose Grip Gang3310819165
5New Daddy’s249919158
6Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong1551328206
7Sports Mall DKSports1531531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Aleksandr Eyre
published 4
3.79
Garrett Peck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Asaf Vos
published 4
3.67
Nicholas Ujifusa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Jaeden Harris
published
3.43
Edward Ekstrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Gabriel Tapia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Isaza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Colton Kasteler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
James Crafa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Teren Taniuchi
published 3
2.92
Ryan Farr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Matt Farr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Daniel Chase
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Michael Olson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Ujifusa + Garrett Peck4356% games+0.3% vs expected
Asaf Vos + Aleksandr Eyre4156% games−2.2% vs expected
Nicholas Ujifusa + Michael Isaza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aleksandr Eyre
61W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Garrett Peck
30W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Asaf Vos
117W–30L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Nicholas Ujifusa
115W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Jaeden Harris
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Edward Ekstrom
30W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Gabriel Tapia
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Michael Isaza
142W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Colton Kasteler
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
James Crafa
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Teren Taniuchi
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Ryan Farr
105W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
Matt Farr
37W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Daniel Chase
4W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Michael Olson
39W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.