Teams

New Daddy’s

2026 3.0 · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.64 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-17vs Liberty Park-Wright/HarnicherLost 12
W#1 DoublesConner Smith / Chase Maeser vs Nicholas Geer / Jordan Christensen7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDylan Richardson / Hall Humphrey vs Thomas Good / Naga Bhargav Paritala2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSimeon Thomas / Cole Benedict vs Nguyen Thai / Tyler Findlay2-6, 4-6
2026-08-13vs Liberty Park-ZenMaxxersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Fyfe / Hudson Martin vs Isaac Lee / Zach Harris6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDylan Richardson / Hall Humphrey vs Brenden van Berkum / Mike Evanko6-7, 3-6
2026-08-06vs Liberty Park-Vorasane/FongSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChase Maeser / Tomas Barrera vs Andrew Bliss / Ryan Graham6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSimeon Thomas / John Pylidis vs Lorenzo Lucas / Jeffrey Vai7-6, 6-3
2026-07-30vs Sports Mall DKSportsWon 10
W#2 DoublesHall Humphrey / Chase Maeser vs JOSEPH BROWN / Kale Thompson7-6, 6-3
2026-07-18vs Sports Mall-Vos/IsazaLost 02
L#1 DoublesHudson Martin / Benjamin Jagolinzer vs Garrett Peck / Aleksandr Eyre6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesConner Smith / Marty Pye vs Gabriel Tapia / Colton Kasteler6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-09vs Loose Grip GangSplit 11
L#1 DoublesParker Ellis / Casey Patrick vs Christopher Bratcher / Quinn Pritchett6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarty Pye / Logan Roberts vs Matt Downing / Jon Reed6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza5011414134
2Liberty Park-Wright/Harnicher5113512122
3Liberty Park-ZenMaxxers329614129
4Loose Grip Gang3310819165
5New Daddy’s249919158
6Liberty Park-Vorasane/Fong1551328206
7Sports Mall DKSports1531531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Brian Annen
published 4
3.84
Hudson Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Casey Patrick
published 4
3.80
Benjamin Jagolinzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Ryan Fyfe
published 4
3.67
Parker Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Manti Hansen
published 4
3.59
Thomas Hagel
published
3.45
Conner Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Logan Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Chase Maeser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Marty Pye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Dylan Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Tomas Barrera
published 3
2.90
Simeon Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
John Pylidis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hudson Martin + Manti Hansen8169% games+16.1% vs expected
Chase Maeser + Conner Smith4166% games+15.9% vs expected
Dylan Richardson + Conner Smith7070% games+14.7% vs expected
Chase Maeser + Hudson Martin6159% games+6.7% vs expected
Dylan Richardson + Simeon Thomas7258% games+6.3% vs expected
Chase Maeser + Marty Pye5053% games+5.5% vs expected
Ryan Fyfe + Brian Annen6058% gamesnot enough data
Chase Maeser + Manti Hansen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Annen
76W–40L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Hudson Martin
56W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Casey Patrick
96W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Benjamin Jagolinzer
46W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ryan Fyfe
86W–74L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Parker Ellis
48W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.67
4
Manti Hansen
124W–51L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Thomas Hagel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Conner Smith
39W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Logan Roberts
43W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Chase Maeser
30W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Marty Pye
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Dylan Richardson
52W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Tomas Barrera
21W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Simeon Thomas
34W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
John Pylidis
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.