Teams

Thongphok - Rose All Play 3.5

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-25Won 20
W#2 SinglesAlison Serino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAnto Faini vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-21vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesVien An Van vs Jennifer Coady6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Anna Shin6-3, 6-1
2025-10-20vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Won 10
W#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Natalie Leveque5-5
2025-10-17vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesVien An Van vs Natalie Leveque6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAlison Serino vs Katie Young3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKaren Coyne vs Amy Flynn1-6, 1-6
2025-10-14vs Quinlan - String Theory 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAlison Serino vs Lesli Thompson3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesKaren Coyne vs Pam Franks4-6, 5-5
2025-10-08vs Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesVien An Van vs Kim Atkinson4-6, 3-3
L#3 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Erin McVeigh2-6, 3-6
2025-09-29vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesVien An Van vs Maggie Johnson6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAlison Serino vs Sanghee Lee7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-25vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesAnto Faini vs Jennifer Nazaire6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Elvira McCullough5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKaren Coyne vs Lynn Gorman1-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesVien An Van vs Kim Atkinson4-6, 2-4
W#3 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Bari Abensohn6-4, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Vien An Van
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.70
Meaghan Williams
published
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Coyne
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Karen Coyne + Vien An Van224 matchesnot enough data
Vien An Van + Sandy Thongphok303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vien An Van
88W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Meaghan Williams
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.70
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Karen Coyne
62W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.