Teams

Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.5

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-02vs Quinlan - String Theory 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Colleen Knapp6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-24vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Linda Tsai1-6, 3-6
2025-10-17vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Won 10
W#2 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Anna Shin6-4, 7-5
2025-10-14vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesChrissy Adair vs Jennifer Nazaire6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesShrijoyee Ray vs Karlene Brathwaite6-2, 7-5
2025-10-10vs Quinlan - String Theory 3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Colleen Knapp6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Lesli Thompson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-08vs Thongphok - Rose All Play 3.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Sandy Thongphok6-2, 6-3
2025-09-25vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesChrissy Adair vs Maggie Johnson6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Linda Tsai7-5, 4-4
L#3 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Vonetta Vaughan3-6, 0-6
2025-09-19vs mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5Lost 02
L#2 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Elvira McCullough7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Katie Young3-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs Thongphok - Rose All Play 3.5Split 11
W#2 SinglesChrissy Adair vs Kathryn Williams6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Sandy Thongphok4-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
3.75
Kiley Murphy
published
3.71
Kim Atkinson
published
3.52
Bari Abensohn
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Chrissy Adair
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Shrijoyee Ray
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin McVeigh
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Heather Nesti
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3
2.58
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Nesti + Erin McVeigh6363% games+9.5% vs expected
Cecilia-Hien Phan + Shrijoyee Ray224 matchesnot enough data
Kiley Murphy + Katherine Fluharty213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Fluharty
121W–58L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
Kiley Murphy
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Kim Atkinson
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Bari Abensohn
95W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Chrissy Adair
115W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Shrijoyee Ray
124W–76L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Erin McVeigh
101W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Heather Nesti
179W–165L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.