Teams

Tan - SHL

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-09vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Wroten / Shellie McCall vs Abigail Nelson / Melanie Hoad6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJean Lee / Whitney Calametti vs Constant Change / Tracey Mcclurd7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-02vs Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesShellie McCall / Debbie Wroten vs Alexia Rycroft / Charlotte Stark1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Lee / Whitney Calametti vs Ive Marsach / Grace Allen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Stacey Martin vs Lauren Anderson / Kristyn Miller2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-20vs Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Wroten / Shellie McCall vs Alexia Rycroft / Jennifer Passeretti4-6, 4-6
2024-09-18vs Marino - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Wroten / Shellie McCall vs Dawn Marino / Melanie Hoad6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Doerr / Whitney Calametti vs Constant Change / Abigail Nelson1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Maria Hicks vs Ann Scott / Jennifer Gilroy6-2, 6-3
2024-08-28vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesChanda Dasinger / Shellie McCall vs Dawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Maria Hicks vs Kris Pritchard / Jennifer Gilroy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-21vs Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Doerr / Whitney Calametti vs KIMBERLY ANDREWS / Ive Marsach1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Debbie Wroten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Shellie McCall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Stacey Martin
published
3.81
Whitney Calametti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chanda Dasinger
published 4
3.73
Sophie Rudman
published
3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.33
Heather Doerr
published
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Calametti + Debbie Wroten3945% gamesnot enough data
Shellie McCall + Whitney Calametti3549% gamesnot enough data
Shellie McCall + Debbie Wroten6161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Wroten
85W–104L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Shellie McCall
158W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Stacey Martin
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Whitney Calametti
68W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Chanda Dasinger
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sophie Rudman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Heather Doerr
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.