Teams

Marino - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-16vs Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd vs Mandy Blair / Charlotte Stark5-7, 3-6
2024-10-09vs Tan - SHLWon 10
W#2 DoublesConstant Change / Tracey Mcclurd vs Jean Lee / Whitney Calametti7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-25vs Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd vs Jennifer Passeretti / Alexia Rycroft1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesConstant Change / Marina Agadzi vs Ive Marsach / Grace Allen5-7, 0-6
2024-09-18vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Melanie Hoad vs Debbie Wroten / Shellie McCall0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-04vs Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Leigh Owens vs Jennifer Passeretti / Arlene Doyle3-6, 2-6
2024-08-28vs Tan - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd vs Chanda Dasinger / Shellie McCall6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAbigail Nelson / Marina Agadzi vs Jean Lee / Lucy Paux6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Melanie Hoad
published 4.5
4.29
Abigail Nelson
published 4.5
3.65
Elizabeth Elliott
published
3.65
Tanya Leigh Shaffer
published
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Tracey Mcclurd
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.52
Dawn Marino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ann Scott
published 3.5
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
published
Kris Pritchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Mcclurd + Dawn Marino4844% games+5.8% vs expected
Tracey Mcclurd + Marina Agadzi2447% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Marino + Marina Agadzi1438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Melanie Hoad
4W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Abigail Nelson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Tanya Leigh Shaffer
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Tracey Mcclurd
63W–107L career · 6 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Dawn Marino
69W–110L career · 8 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ann Scott
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3
Anne Douglass Williams
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.