Teams

Escambia/Andresen/TriLevel4.5W

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-02vs Tan - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlexia Rycroft / Charlotte Stark vs Shellie McCall / Debbie Wroten0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Anderson / Kristyn Miller vs Cherie Tan / Stacey Martin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-25vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Passeretti / Alexia Rycroft vs Dawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Andresen / Tonya Pfeifle vs Jennifer Jackson / Jacqueline Wallace6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-20vs Tan - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexia Rycroft / Jennifer Passeretti vs Debbie Wroten / Shellie McCall6-4, 6-4
2024-09-04vs Marino - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Passeretti / Arlene Doyle vs Dawn Marino / Leigh Owens6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Kristyn Miller vs Jennifer Jackson / Anne Douglass Williams6-2, 6-0
2024-08-21vs Tan - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Doyle / Rachel Trahan vs Chanda Dasinger / Jean Lee6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Alexia Rycroft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Arlene Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.99
Jennifer Passeretti
published
3.93
Rachel Trahan
published
3.86
Ive Marsach
published
3.79
Tonya Pfeifle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Andresen
published
3.63
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
published
3.53
Natalie Mcelhany
published
3.52
Amanda Brown
published 4
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Grace Allen
published
Mandy Blair
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KIMBERLY ANDREWS + Ive Marsach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Rycroft
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Arlene Doyle
116W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
Jennifer Passeretti
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
Rachel Trahan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.93
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Tonya Pfeifle
154W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Lisa Andresen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Natalie Mcelhany
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
4
Amanda Brown
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Grace Allen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mandy Blair
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.