Teams

Bringard/Broadbent (DAY)

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-19vs Glancy 40’s ComboSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLissi Rabon / Trisha Kelley vs Kelly Flynn / Nicole Slocumb5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Salisbury / Martha Broadbent vs Kim Byrd / Ali Cause6-2, 6-2
2025-10-16vs Martin Eshelman ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesJean Robbins / Kristina Durham vs Kelly Capobianco / Jenna Butler6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKristin Porcelli / Mary Simmons vs Jean Nichols / Julie Dimock3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Memory / Martha Broadbent vs April Eshelman / Hope Sloan6-1, 6-0
2025-10-07vs Duckworth/SchoolfieldLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Broadbent / Laura Rackley vs Kelly Catino / Lyndsey Stainback0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Porcelli / Mary Simmons vs Kathleen Epperly / Helen Leonard4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSally Bringard / Renee Saffo vs Tracy Mcmullan / Tracy Mills2-6, 3-6
2025-09-30vs Anderson/GovoniWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Salisbury / Christine Tatum vs Stacey Anderson / Nancy Holly2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKristin Porcelli / Mary Simmons vs Lynne Loccisano / Kelly Scheer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLissi Rabon / Kristina Durham vs Lynda Anderson / Renee Watson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-23vs Davidson 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Broadbent / Patricia Thomson vs Christine Tryer / Lara Hanks6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJean Robbins / Jamie Lanzi vs Maureen Fehrs / Michelle Sahlie7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristina Durham / Mary Salisbury vs Sarah McKenzie / Debra Jones6-7, 1-6
2025-09-14vs KullbergLost 03
L#1 DoublesTrisha Kelley / Lissi Rabon vs Ashley DeGroote / Kristine Janik1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Simmons / Laura Rackley vs Amy Kullberg / Logan Sullivan2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSally Bringard / Renee Saffo vs Brandy Crawford / Christian Miller7-6
2025-09-09vs Brandkamp 40sLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Thomson / Lissi Rabon vs Melissa Russ / Cara Foucht6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKristin Porcelli / Mary Simmons vs Autumn Correnti / Jackie Cruse5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Memory / Martha Broadbent vs Tracy Pierson / Ashley Doyle0-6, 3-6
2025-09-04vs deOliva/WestcottWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Broadbent / Patricia Thomson vs Stacie Williams / Deedee Greene6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLissi Rabon / Trisha Kelley vs Julia Mattingly / Leslie Barker4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRenee Saffo / Mary Simmons vs Jennifer Wescott / Alexis Wall7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Godfrey/MilkesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristina Durham / Lissi Rabon vs Angelia Gallimore / Candy Garrett1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMartha Broadbent / Christine Tatum vs Kelly Godfrey / Patti Sizemore4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJean Robbins / Jamie Lanzi vs Ann Carmichael Prior / Becky Farris6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lissi Rabon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.40
Patricia Thomson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jamie Lanzi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Trisha Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Kristin Porcelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Christine Tatum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Renee Saffo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kristina Durham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Beverly Memory
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Mary Salisbury
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Laura Rackley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Sally Bringard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Robbins
published
Martha Broadbent
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Thomson + Kristin Porcelli213 matchesnot enough data
Lissi Rabon + Trisha Kelley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lissi Rabon
10W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Patricia Thomson
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jamie Lanzi
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Trisha Kelley
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Kristin Porcelli
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christine Tatum
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Renee Saffo
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kristina Durham
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Beverly Memory
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Mary Salisbury
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Laura Rackley
10W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Sally Bringard
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Jean Robbins
72W–57L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Broadbent
10W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.