Teams

Davidson 40+

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-19vs Brandkamp 40sLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Jones / Joelle Crocker vs Lisa Brandkamp / Elizabeth Claus1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristine Tryer / Daphne Davidson vs Lisa Graham / Stephanie Farrell0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSarah McKenzie / Sue Fuller vs Kathleen Graeser / Kathryn Weeks4-6, 0-6
2025-10-16vs deOliva/WestcottWon 21
L#1 DoublesLara Hanks / Alisa Morgan vs Kristen Butler / Katie Ferree6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Messier / Joelle Crocker vs Jennifer Wescott / Alisa Cowan7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah McKenzie / Christine Tryer vs Pati DeOliva / Stacie Williams6-3, 7-6
2025-10-07vs Glancy 40’s ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesLara Hanks / Amy Messier vs Patti Kucan / Genevieve Hansler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Fehrs / Betty Mahoney vs Audrey Robbins / Ally Langdon2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSarah McKenzie / Debra Jones vs Kathleen Glancy / Linda Haller4-3
2025-09-30vs Martin Eshelman ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaureen Fehrs / Michelle Sahlie vs Sabrina Davis / Kelly Cooper3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSue Fuller / Amy Messier vs Amanda Mason / Jean Nichols6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLara Hanks / Alisa Morgan vs Liz Carroll / April Eshelman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-23vs Bringard/Broadbent (DAY)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Tryer / Lara Hanks vs Martha Broadbent / Patricia Thomson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Fehrs / Michelle Sahlie vs Jean Robbins / Jamie Lanzi6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSarah McKenzie / Debra Jones vs Kristina Durham / Mary Salisbury7-6, 6-1
2025-09-14vs Anderson/GovoniLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebra Jones / Amy Messier vs Hilary Cole / Melissa Huffman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Sahlie / Maureen Fehrs vs Lynne Loccisano / Liz Govoni1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Nelson / Sue Fuller vs Barbara Caropolo / Lynda Anderson2-6, 6-7
2025-08-26vs KullbergLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Fehrs / Betty Mahoney vs Jill Scerri / Caroline Blanton6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoelle Crocker / Sarah McKenzie vs Amy Kullberg / Christian Miller2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Tryer / Amy Messier vs Kristine Janik / Jennifer Parrotte2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Debra Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Lara Hanks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Amy Messier
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.43
Sue Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Joelle Crocker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Maureen Fehrs
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Sarah McKenzie
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Betty Mahoney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Alisa Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Daphne Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Michelle Sahlie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Dawn Heatwole
published 3.5
3.08
Christine Tryer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sahlie + Maureen Fehrs3546% games−14.5% vs expected
Maureen Fehrs + Betty Mahoney3256% gamesnot enough data
Lara Hanks + Alisa Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Jones
24W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lara Hanks
14W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Amy Messier
39W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Sue Fuller
25W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Joelle Crocker
37W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Maureen Fehrs
25W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Sarah McKenzie
35W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Betty Mahoney
5W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alisa Morgan
27W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Daphne Davidson
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Michelle Sahlie
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dawn Heatwole
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christine Tryer
13W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.