Teams

Glancy 40’s Combo

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Women 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-19vs Bringard/Broadbent (DAY)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Flynn / Nicole Slocumb vs Lissi Rabon / Trisha Kelley7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Byrd / Ali Cause vs Mary Salisbury / Martha Broadbent2-6, 2-6
2025-10-16vs Duckworth/SchoolfieldWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Slocumb / Kelly Flynn vs Kelly Catino / Lyndsey Stainback2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatti Kucan / Genevieve Hansler vs Louise Hemmerle / Kelly Buffalino7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathleen Glancy / Linda Haller vs Carolyn Noto / Helen Leonard2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-14vs Anderson/GovoniLost 12
L#1 DoublesAli Cause / Kim Byrd vs Stacey Anderson / Lori Kalan3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGenevieve Hansler / Ally Langdon vs Lynne Loccisano / Nancy Holly6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulianne Assad / Britt LaValley vs Darlene Satifka / Liz Govoni3-6, 4-6
2025-10-07vs Davidson 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatti Kucan / Genevieve Hansler vs Lara Hanks / Amy Messier2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Robbins / Ally Langdon vs Maureen Fehrs / Betty Mahoney6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKathleen Glancy / Linda Haller vs Sarah McKenzie / Debra Jones3-4
2025-09-23vs KullbergLost 12
W#1 DoublesBritt LaValley / Julianne Assad vs Kimberly Batten / Jennifer Parrotte6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Slocumb / Kelly Flynn vs Amy Kullberg / Kristine Janik1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Glancy / Genevieve Hansler vs Jill Scerri / Jan Best2-6, 6-7
2025-09-18vs Brandkamp 40sWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Davis / Kim Byrd vs Kathryn Weeks / Cara Foucht0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGenevieve Hansler / Ally Langdon vs Jackie Cruse / Stephanie Farrell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Glancy / Julianne Assad vs Melissa Russ / Vickie Kosh6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-14vs deOliva/WestcottWon 21
L#1 DoublesAli Cause / Kim Byrd vs Deedee Greene / Leigh Burris6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Borcherding / Julianne Assad vs Pati DeOliva / Stacie Williams5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Slocumb / Kelly Flynn vs Leslie Barker / Alisa Cowan6-2, 6-3
2025-09-09vs Godfrey/MilkesWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Borcherding / Genevieve Hansler vs Debbie Trafton / Linda McKinney6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlly Langdon / Ali Cause vs Lisa Keeton / Kimberly Selsky7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatti Kucan / Kelly Flynn vs Lori Brinkley / Becky Farris5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Martin Eshelman ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesAudrey Robbins / Sara Borcherding vs Jenna Butler / Kelly Capobianco6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Flynn / Nicole Slocumb vs Denise Lopatka / Kelly Cooper6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathleen Glancy / Linda Haller vs Jean Nichols / Jennifer Hawfield6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Audrey Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Beth Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Genevieve Hansler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Ally Langdon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Nicole Slocumb
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.37
Ali Cause
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Kathleen Glancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Patti Kucan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Britt LaValley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Julianne Assad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Haller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Borcherding
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Glancy + Linda Haller4548% games−7.6% vs expected
Genevieve Hansler + Ali Cause224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Robbins
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Beth Davis
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Genevieve Hansler
17W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Ally Langdon
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Nicole Slocumb
54W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Ali Cause
6W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Kathleen Glancy
10W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Patti Kucan
44W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Britt LaValley
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Julianne Assad
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Haller
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Borcherding
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.