Teams

Schenk

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Umphlette / Kim Worton vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Margo Nef2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCollette Bott / Bonnie Peterson vs Barbara Ehardt / Jane Woodland5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVicki Krogstrand / Tamara Gardner vs Eli Griffin / Toni Velasquez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-14vs Hulse's HeroesWon 30
W#1 DoublesTresa Mason / Kim Worton vs Teresa Beebe / Jane Woodland6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCollette Bott / Cindy Carr vs Margo Nef / Jacqualyn Nelson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSue Hunter / Bonnie Peterson vs Susan Hulse / Rebecca Lanier6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-12vs Hulse's HeroesWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorraine Baker / Julie Umphlette vs Teresa Beebe / Jane Woodland3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Carr / Kim Worton vs Libby Cameron / Toni Velasquez6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTresa Mason / Ann Schenk vs Margo Nef / Jacqualyn Nelson6-4, 6-4
2021-07-07vs Hulse's HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorraine Baker / Julie Umphlette vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Margo Nef6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCollette Bott / Tamara Gardner vs Eli Griffin / Teresa Beebe6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSue Hunter / Bonnie Peterson vs Jinny Boozer / Susan Hulse6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-01vs Hulse's HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorraine Baker / Tamara Gardner vs Jacqualyn Nelson / Jane Woodland1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSue Hunter / Bonnie Peterson vs Libby Cameron / Eli Griffin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Fuller / Vicki Krogstrand vs Barbara Ehardt / Rebecca Lanier0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-29vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLorraine Baker / Collette Bott vs Jane Woodland / Jacqualyn Nelson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTresa Mason / Ann Schenk vs Teresa Beebe / Eli Griffin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Fuller / Vicki Krogstrand vs Barbara Ehardt / Rebecca Lanier6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-24vs Hulse's HeroesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Hunter / Ann Schenk vs Anne Gaffney / Jane Woodland2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVicki Krogstrand / Julie Umphlette vs Toni Velasquez / Eli Griffin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTamara Gardner / Cindy Carr vs Barbara Ehardt / Teresa Beebe3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Tresa Mason
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.55
Julie Umphlette
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Jackie Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lorraine Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Sue Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.20
Collette Bott
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.06
Bonnie Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Tamara Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ann Schenk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Cindy Carr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Worton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Vicki Krogstrand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Umphlette + Lorraine Baker10262% games+7.7% vs expected
Julie Umphlette + Collette Bott7456% games+5.7% vs expected
Sue Hunter + Bonnie Peterson191354% games+4.6% vs expected
Lorraine Baker + Tamara Gardner11359% games+0.1% vs expected
Vicki Krogstrand + Kim Worton11361% games−1.0% vs expected
Tamara Gardner + Collette Bott81745% games−2.0% vs expected
Julie Umphlette + Tamara Gardner5454% games−2.1% vs expected
Lorraine Baker + Collette Bott7747% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tresa Mason
199W–177L career · 8 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.98
3.5
Julie Umphlette
86W–72L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Jackie Fuller
17W–11L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Lorraine Baker
72W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Sue Hunter
48W–44L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Collette Bott
66W–91L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Bonnie Peterson
98W–72L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Tamara Gardner
66W–69L career · 6 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Ann Schenk
69W–85L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Cindy Carr
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Worton
38W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Krogstrand
113W–84L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.