Teams

NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A

2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-08vs PIONEER PK 65AW6.0ALost 02
L#2 DoublesCathy Green / Cheryl M Toivola vs Bernadette McCarthy / Florence Pattison4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Tarantino / Karin Oliver vs Barb D Ryan / Betty Rasmussen5-7, 6-7
L#1 DoublesCheryl M Toivola / Karin Oliver vs Janet Phelps / Nancy Swick2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dever / Teresa Levin vs Colleen Winters / Celia Welch2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobynne Piggott / Janet Tupper vs Valerie Mitchell-Johnson / Alexandra Lorraine2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJanet Tupper / Julie John vs Imelda Lee / Pamela Moore0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Green / Karin Oliver vs Madeleine Mulgrew / Josephine Rosman3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Lum / Mary Palmer vs Wendy Duncan / Victoria Mangaser2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesBarbara Lum / Nancy Tarantino vs Catherine Hoffman / Linda Zellerbach6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCarmel Engel / Regan Reid vs Virginia Pflueger / Nancy Swick1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCathy Green / Cheryl M Toivola vs Patricia Tyler / Colleen Winters0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBarbara Lum / Martha Jane Holman vs Imelda Lee / Yolanda Irigon0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Green / Julie John vs Pamela Moore / Madeleine Mulgrew2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Palmer / Teresa Levin vs Nancy Jones / Carole Tarantino3-6, 4-6
2026-03-11vs PIONEER PK 65AW6.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie John / Cathy Green vs Bernadette McCarthy / Florence Pattison7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dever / Martha Jane Holman vs Betty Rasmussen / Dolores Roque7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Palmer / Janet Tupper vs Ellen Clark / Stefany Toll2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCathy Green / Deborah Dever vs Pamela Moore / Gail Chin3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobynne Piggott / Regan Reid vs Imelda Lee / Terry Christophel1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesCathy Green / Deborah Dever vs Janet Phelps / Nancy Swick0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Tarantino / Karin Oliver vs Colleen Winters / Celia Welch7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Levin / Janet Tupper vs BJ Thrailkill / Valerie Mitchell-Johnson2-6, 2-6
2026-02-12vs PIONEER PK 65AW6.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Jane Holman / Barbara Lum vs Mina Solemani / Florence Pattison6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanet Tupper / Teresa Levin vs Lynne Apostle / Stefany Toll6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRegan Reid / Cheryl M Toivola vs Sandra Ricci / Kim Richard7-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesNancy Tarantino / Majella Campbell vs Terry Christophel / Yolanda Irigon7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Lum / Lisa Hansen vs Carol Kim / Pamela Moore0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKarin Oliver / Deborah Dever vs Laura Fowler / Karen Hill4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A9122820224
2MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 65AW6.0A82201023232
3NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A64181228238
4LOS GATOS SR 65AW6.0A55141633247
5PIONEER PK 65AW6.0A37131738297
6RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0A28111941307
7NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A2872350347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carmel Engel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Martha Jane Holman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Julie John
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Cheryl M Toivola
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Nancy Tarantino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Majella Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Deborah Dever
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.45
Janet Tupper
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.42
Barbara Lum
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Karin Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Regan Reid
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robynne Piggott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Teresa Levin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carmel Engel
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Martha Jane Holman
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Julie John
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cheryl M Toivola
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Nancy Tarantino
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Majella Campbell
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Deborah Dever
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Janet Tupper
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
3
Barbara Lum
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Karin Oliver
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Regan Reid
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robynne Piggott
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Levin
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.