Teams

LOS GATOS SR 65AW6.0A

2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-07vs RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesHaik Russell / Kim Gavin vs Bing Hattori / Kate OHanlan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Abate / Joan Culin vs Judy Gee / Lindy Brauner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKim Gavin / Kathleen Chopra vs Deborah Baker / Lucy Olivares4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Abate / Joan Culin vs Rebecca McCarthy / Deena Davalos6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJoan Culin / Jule Flores vs Deborah Baker / Luz Bachofer7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Gavin / Sandra Miller vs Nancy Hillman / Gale Marshall6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCindy Motamedi / Marcy Rosenberg vs Deborah Baker / Denise Ramos6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Grover / Sandra Miller vs Deena Davalos / Rebecca McCarthy3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Abate / Joan Culin vs Nancy Hillman / Helena Mak6-2, 6-4
2026-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Gavin / Vonda Reid vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCindy Motamedi / Haik Russell vs Deborah Baker / Laura Schenkelberg4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Grover / Marcy Rosenberg vs Rebecca McCarthy / Carol Muhn4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJule Flores / Haik Russell vs Luz Bachofer / Rosana Castronuevo6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJune Li / Elizabeth Grover vs Gale Marshall / Marjorie Moniz6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLeticia Lafosse / Marcy Rosenberg vs Deborah Baker / Lucy Olivares6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-27vs RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeticia Lafosse / Vonda Reid vs Brooke Andrews / Elena Tuck6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCindy Motamedi / Marcy Rosenberg vs Bing Hattori / Pongsri Lu7-5, 6-3
2026-02-24vs RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesHaik Russell / Jule Flores vs Bing Hattori / Kate OHanlan3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCindy Motamedi / Kim Gavin vs Patty Coulson / Lindy Brauner6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMarcy Rosenberg / Sandra Miller vs Rosie Mok / Elena Tuck5-7, 3-6
2026-02-05vs RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoan Culin / Kim Gavin vs Kate OHanlan / Judy Gee4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Grover / Leticia Lafosse vs Deborah Hullings-Le / Rosie Mok6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHaik Russell / June Li vs Ginny Mayer / Martha Reitman6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A9122820224
2MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 65AW6.0A82201023232
3NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A64181228238
4LOS GATOS SR 65AW6.0A55141633247
5PIONEER PK 65AW6.0A37131738297
6RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0A28111941307
7NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A2872350347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Jule Flores
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Joan Culin
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.82
Leticia Lafosse
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Haik Russell
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.76
Cindy Motamedi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Vonda Reid
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.75
Ellen Abate
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Kim Gavin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.67
Elizabeth Grover
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Vicki Velez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kathleen Chopra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Marcy Rosenberg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.24
Kathy Serksnis
published
1.90
Suzanne Yost
published
Sharon Bartels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vonda Reid + Jule Flores1451% games+2.0% vs expected
Marcy Rosenberg + Cindy Motamedi224 matchesnot enough data
Leticia Lafosse + Jule Flores213 matchesnot enough data
Leticia Lafosse + Cindy Motamedi123 matchesnot enough data
Joan Culin + Ellen Abate213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jule Flores
23W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Joan Culin
18W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.84
Leticia Lafosse
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Haik Russell
15W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Cindy Motamedi
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Vonda Reid
18W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Ellen Abate
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Kim Gavin
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Elizabeth Grover
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Vicki Velez
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Kathleen Chopra
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Marcy Rosenberg
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kathy Serksnis
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Suzanne Yost
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Sharon Bartels
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.