Teams

PIONEER PK 65AW6.0A

2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-08vs NAPA V CC 65AW6.0AWon 20
W#2 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Florence Pattison vs Cathy Green / Cheryl M Toivola6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarb D Ryan / Betty Rasmussen vs Nancy Tarantino / Karin Oliver7-5, 7-6
L#1 DoublesDana Gray / Florence Pattison vs Pamela Moore / Gail Chin5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Barb D Ryan vs Laura Fowler / Karen Hill6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesGail Enos / Dolores Roque vs Carole Tarantino / Nancy Jones1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBetty Rasmussen / Mina Solemani vs Valerie Mitchell-Johnson / Nancy Swick4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Clark / Kim Richard vs Colleen Winters / Alexandra Lorraine5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGail Enos / Barb D Ryan vs ALLISON WHITLOCK / Virginia Pflueger3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Florence Pattison vs Josephine Rosman / Wendy Duncan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Gray / Mina Solemani vs Imelda Lee / Victoria Mangaser4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Norton / Barb D Ryan vs Carole Tarantino / Laura Fowler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDana Gray / Barb D Ryan vs Pamela Moore / Madeleine Mulgrew3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTherese Moran / Stefany Toll vs Karen Hill / Terry Christophel6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNina Pasquale / Dolores Roque vs Nancy Jones / Victoria Mangaser5-7, 6-7
2026-03-11vs NAPA V CC 65AW6.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Florence Pattison vs Julie John / Cathy Green6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetty Rasmussen / Dolores Roque vs Deborah Dever / Martha Jane Holman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEllen Clark / Stefany Toll vs Mary Palmer / Janet Tupper6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Barb D Ryan vs Valerie Mitchell-Johnson / Nancy Swick6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetty Rasmussen / Kim Richard vs Celia Welch / Colleen Winters3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLynne Apostle / Susan Norton vs Margaret Angelovich / Catherine Hoffman1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMina Solemani / Dana Gray vs Virginia Pflueger / Janet Phelps5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynne Apostle / Florence Pattison vs Margaret Angelovich / Catherine Hoffman1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGail Enos / Betty Rasmussen vs Jane Matijasic / ALLISON WHITLOCK6-3, 6-1
2026-02-12vs NAPA V CC 65AW6.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesMina Solemani / Florence Pattison vs Martha Jane Holman / Barbara Lum3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Apostle / Stefany Toll vs Janet Tupper / Teresa Levin7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSandra Ricci / Kim Richard vs Regan Reid / Cheryl M Toivola6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Florence Pattison vs Janet Phelps / Virginia Pflueger6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKim Richard / Stefany Toll vs Nancy Swick / Linda Zellerbach6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBetty Rasmussen / Nina Pasquale vs Margaret Angelovich / Catherine Hoffman6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A9122820224
2MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 65AW6.0A82201023232
3NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A64181228238
4LOS GATOS SR 65AW6.0A55141633247
5PIONEER PK 65AW6.0A37131738297
6RINCONADA PK 65AW6.0A28111941307
7NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A2872350347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Bernadette McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Dana Gray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Barb D Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Betty Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dolores Roque
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ellen Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Florence Pattison
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Gail Enos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Richard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lynne Apostle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mina Solemani
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nina Pasquale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Ricci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stefany Toll
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Therese Moran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette McCarthy + Barb D Ryan2349% gamesnot enough data
Florence Pattison + Bernadette McCarthy224 matchesnot enough data
Florence Pattison + Barb D Ryan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bernadette McCarthy
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Dana Gray
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Barb D Ryan
6W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
Betty Rasmussen
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Dolores Roque
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ellen Clark
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Florence Pattison
3W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gail Enos
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Richard
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynne Apostle
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mina Solemani
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nina Pasquale
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Ricci
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stefany Toll
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Therese Moran
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.