Teams

NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Damschroder-Launchpad

2024 NWO Mixed 18 & Over · NWO MX 18 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesRandy Kim / Caitlyn Schankula vs Bradley Smith / Rosanna Wong6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatt Damschroder / Amber Copa vs Amanda Smith / Connor Senn6-0, 6-0
2024-05-12Won 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Damschroder / Jessica Vietmeier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Copa / Braden Tucker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRandy Kim / Caitlyn Schankula vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-28vs NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Riggs-TWOSLost 02
L#1 DoublesBraden Tucker / Jill Gauthier vs Dana Loeb / Bradley Riggs0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Kim / Caitlyn Schankula vs Lisa Burke / Thedore Morse3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-21vs NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed King-TWOSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Damschroder / Jessica Vietmeier vs Drew Dominiak / Kaitlyn Inniger3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Copa / Robert Winsor vs Mike King / Ashley Hartzell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBraden Tucker / Caitlyn Schankula vs Jennifer Zinz / Steven Eilert3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJill Gauthier / Matt Damschroder vs Andrew Derian / Julie Szczechowski6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Copa / Robert Winsor vs Stacy Jurich / Samuel Gold6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Kaczorowski / Jessica Vietmeier vs James Babkiewicz / Cayla Swisher6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMatt Damschroder / Jessica Vietmeier vs Bradley Smith / Amy Farrar7-5, 1-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Copa / Tristan Uribes vs Lyndsey Lucas / Connor Senn6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesRandy Kim / Caitlyn Schankula vs Amanda Smith / Bob Yonker6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJames Kaczorowski / Jessica Vietmeier vs Vincent Halliday / Angela Horn6-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesTristan Uribes / Amber Copa vs Douglas Linden / Patricia Naus3-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesRandy Kim / Caitlyn Schankula vs Brian Buckey / Christina Tam6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCaitlyn Schankula / Randy Kim vs Gilbert Rangel Jr / Julie Britton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBraden Tucker / Jill Gauthier vs Nancy Rumpf / Darin Freeman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatt Damschroder / Jessica Vietmeier vs Emily Nixon / Steve Nixon6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO MX 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Hoover/Nixon-Launchpad7116822203
2NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed King-TWOS6116517159
3NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Damschroder-Launchpad3481326184
4NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Riggs-TWOS3491228196
5NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Bloomquist/Naus35111328200
6NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Smith/Lewis -PTC35101433223
7NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Szczechowski1681329202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Braden Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Tristan Uribes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Jessica Vietmeier
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Jill Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amber Copa
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.75
Matt Damschroder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Caitlyn Schankula
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Robert Winsor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Randy Kim
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.56
James Kaczorowski
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tristan Uribes + Amber Copa8266% games+8.9% vs expected
Randy Kim + Caitlyn Schankula8262% games+8.3% vs expected
Matt Damschroder + Jessica Vietmeier241153% games+1.1% vs expected
Caitlyn Schankula + Braden Tucker3353% games−3.1% vs expected
Randy Kim + Amber Copa2356% gamesnot enough data
Robert Winsor + Amber Copa2353% gamesnot enough data
Matt Damschroder + Jill Gauthier224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Vietmeier + James Kaczorowski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Braden Tucker
72W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Tristan Uribes
124W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Jessica Vietmeier
171W–73L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Jill Gauthier
220W–163L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amber Copa
153W–60L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Matt Damschroder
148W–91L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Caitlyn Schankula
56W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Robert Winsor
69W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Randy Kim
213W–135L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
James Kaczorowski
134W–95L career · 7 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.