Teams

NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Riggs-TWOS

2024 NWO Mixed 18 & Over · NWO MX 18 & Over 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-12vs NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed King-TWOSLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Murphy / Brandon C Gabel vs Drew Dominiak / Kaitlyn Inniger3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJulie MacMillan / Jack Burke vs Emily Nixon / Tim Thornton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDana Loeb / Bradley Riggs vs Nancy Rumpf / Darin Freeman2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Burke / Thedore Morse vs Isobel Tracy / Andrew Janes5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDana Loeb / Bradley Riggs vs Braden Tucker / Jill Gauthier6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Burke / Thedore Morse vs Randy Kim / Caitlyn Schankula6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJack Burke / Theresa Vietmeier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDana Loeb / Bradley Riggs vs Daniel Klein / Amanda Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThedore Morse / Theresa Vietmeier vs Fernanda Arruda / Bob Yonker3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrandon C Gabel / Heather Murphy vs Hilary Hayden / Connor Senn6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesThedore Morse / Theresa Vietmeier vs Vincent Halliday / Selin Bastas2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Sara Johnson vs Stefan Faerber / Jennifer Abell1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLisa Burke / Jack Burke vs Samantha LaPointe / Tim Thornton5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThedore Morse / Julie MacMillan vs Steve Nixon / Jen Sanderson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeather Murphy / Brandon C Gabel vs Sarah Ward / Andrew Janes4-6, 6-7
2024-03-17vs NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed King-TWOSLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Abodeely / Dana Loeb vs Mike King / Shawna Dippman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBradley Riggs / Heather Murphy vs Steven Eilert / Jennifer Zinz6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThedore Morse / Julie MacMillan vs Drew Dominiak / Kaitlyn Inniger2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Sara Johnson vs Adam Swisher / Susan Dessner1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJack Burke / Lisa Burke vs Amy Beaverson / Jeffrey Judis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Loeb / Bradley Riggs vs Cayla Swisher / Andrew Derian6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO MX 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Hoover/Nixon-Launchpad7116822203
2NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed King-TWOS6116517159
3NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Damschroder-Launchpad3481326184
4NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Riggs-TWOS3491228196
5NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Bloomquist/Naus35111328200
6NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Smith/Lewis -PTC35101433223
7NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Szczechowski1681329202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Bradley Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.07
Jack Burke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Thedore Morse
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.68
Jason Abodeely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
D Lee Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.55
Julie MacMillan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Theresa Vietmeier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Dana Loeb
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Anjali Gupta
published 3.5
Brandon C Gabel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lisa Burke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Abodeely + Theresa Vietmeier5353% games−6.9% vs expected
Thedore Morse + Theresa Vietmeier0529% games−7.7% vs expected
Bradley Riggs + Dana Loeb7062% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Burke + Bradley Riggs3344% gamesnot enough data
Jason Abodeely + Julie MacMillan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bradley Riggs
97W–67L career · 7 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Jack Burke
29W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Thedore Morse
132W–139L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jason Abodeely
211W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
4
D Lee Johnson
112W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.64
Julie MacMillan
42W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Theresa Vietmeier
187W–227L career · 10 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
4
Dana Loeb
124W–135L career · 5 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Anjali Gupta
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Brandon C Gabel
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Burke
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.