Teams

A55 7.0W MV Gustafson

2025 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Spring · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs A55 7.0W BA SilversteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatricia Mercuri / Pamela Zalba vs Heather Pollack / Lisa Dowling6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDenise Ruthenberg / Lynn Sands vs Marla Silverstein / Pam Nelson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren McLeod / Holly Vanjo vs Yolanda Hohman / Karen Trecarichi6-3, 6-3
2025-04-10vs A55 7.0W NR BartramLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Kanetsky / Yulia Lyublinski vs Amy Grace / Jean Harsar4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Vanjo / Holly Vilsack vs Vanessa Furrer / Lynne Hanna6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Patti Baucco vs Lisa Gallagher / Julia Bartram4-6, 3-6
2025-04-03vs A55 7.0W PW BlesiLost 12
L#1 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Patricia Mercuri vs Sheryl Martin / Paige Knapp0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Pamela Zalba vs Alicja Minoff / Karen Lanigan6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren McLeod / Patti Baucco vs Renda Little / Susan Olson7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-27vs A55 7.0W MV O'ShaughnessyWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Zalba / Yulia Lyublinski vs Karen Cipriani / Stacy Goldberg2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Cheryl Kanetsky vs Deborah O'Shaughnessy / Carole Sanderson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Vanjo / Holly Vilsack vs Wendy Hunter / Julie Hazle-Davis7-5, 6-4
2025-03-20vs A55 7.0W CC MarottaLost 12
L#1 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Pamela Zalba vs Natalie Marotta / Marnie Walcutt5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Patricia Mercuri vs Christa Galehouse / Jill Diamond1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Ruthenberg / Lynn Sands vs Patti Naim / Victoria Kuczynski6-2, 6-3
2025-03-06vs A55 7.0W PW ReidWon 30
W#1 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Pamela Zalba vs Julie Morrow / Katherine Reid2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren McLeod / Holly Vanjo vs Ann Maloney / Laurie White6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatti Baucco / Marcy Ogrinc vs Teresa Hardy / Katie Orr6-4, 6-4
2025-02-27vs A55 7.0W NC PinneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Pamela Zalba vs Dee Kelleher / Stephanie Bailey6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Cheryl Kanetsky vs Chris Steigerwald / Vicki Shepherd6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHolly Vanjo / Holly Vilsack vs Dana Pinney / Jo Ann Meister6-4, 6-4
2025-02-20vs A55 7.0W CV LockertLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Kanetsky / Yulia Lyublinski vs Dina Fisher / Laura Weyenberg6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHolly Vanjo / Holly Vilsack vs Kathy Olson / Kristin Hofer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Sands / Patti Baucco vs Cindy Ellis / Karen Lovejoy6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A55 7.0W NR Bartram7118619197
2A55 7.0W CC Marotta7115921182
3A55 7.0W PW Blesi53131127213
4A55 7.0W MV O'Shaughnessy4415921183
5A55 7.0W MV Gustafson44141023210
6A55 7.0W CV Lockert44111332245
7A55 7.0W BA Silverstein35111331234
8A55 7.0W NC Pinney2681633225
9A55 7.0W PW Reid0832142261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Yulia Lyublinski
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.42
Pamela Zalba
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Cheryl Kanetsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Denise Ruthenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Lynn Sands
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Patricia Mercuri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Karen McLeod
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Holly Vanjo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Elyse Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Patti Baucco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Vilsack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marcy Ogrinc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Kanetsky + Lynn Sands7261% games+8.5% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Patricia Mercuri6356% games+6.7% vs expected
Marcy Ogrinc + Patti Baucco7452% games+5.7% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Pamela Zalba91052% games+4.2% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Yulia Lyublinski311258% games+3.4% vs expected
Karen McLeod + Holly Vanjo5256% games−2.7% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Yulia Lyublinski8752% games−4.4% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Cheryl Kanetsky3347% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yulia Lyublinski
130W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Pamela Zalba
147W–134L career · 6 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Kanetsky
114W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Denise Ruthenberg
63W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Sands
48W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Patricia Mercuri
170W–116L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Karen McLeod
54W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
Holly Vanjo
89W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Elyse Gustafson
105W–128L career · 6 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Patti Baucco
62W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Holly Vilsack
79W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcy Ogrinc
54W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.