Teams

A55 7.0W BA Silverstein

2025 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Spring · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs A55 7.0W MV GustafsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Pollack / Lisa Dowling vs Patricia Mercuri / Pamela Zalba2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Pam Nelson vs Denise Ruthenberg / Lynn Sands4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYolanda Hohman / Karen Trecarichi vs Karen McLeod / Holly Vanjo3-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs A55 7.0W PW ReidWon 20
W#1 DoublesBridget Pavlish / Heather Pollack vs Julie Morrow / Sherry Rohweder6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Brubaker / Yolanda Hohman vs Jeanne MacKay / Ann Maloney6-4, 6-3
2025-04-03vs A55 7.0W NC PinneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Bridget Pavlish vs Dee Kelleher / Jing Zhou6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Hughes / Heather Pollack vs Stephanie Bailey / Dana Pinney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Brubaker / Yolanda Hohman vs Wendi Preston / Vicki Shepherd6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs A55 7.0W CV LockertSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Pollack / Lisa Dowling vs Kathy Olson / Kristin Hofer6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesYolanda Hohman / Kelly Pamer vs Liz O'Neil / Carol Duber3-6, 4-6
2025-03-13vs A55 7.0W NR BartramLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Bridget Pavlish vs Julia Bartram / Kristen Boll5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Pollack / Pam Roche vs Vanessa Furrer / Margaret VanDine0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Trecarichi / Jennifer Brush vs Lisa Gallagher / Julie Kelly1-6, 2-6
2025-03-06vs A55 7.0W PW BlesiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBridget Pavlish / Lisa Dowling vs Jennifer Atkinson / Sheryl Martin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Roche / Karen Trecarichi vs Renda Little / Pam Stepnick1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-27vs A55 7.0W MV O'ShaughnessySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Brubaker / Lisa Dowling vs Karen Cipriani / Stacy Goldberg2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Bridget Pavlish vs Kathy Hoercher / Susan Lenahan6-3, 7-5
2025-02-20vs A55 7.0W CC MarottaLost 12
W#1 DoublesBridget Pavlish / Marla Silverstein vs Wendy Cohn / Carla Greenwood6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPam Roche / Pam Nelson vs Danielle Simpson / Suzanne Sbrocco2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Pamer / Jennifer Brush vs Patti Naim / Victoria Kuczynski3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A55 7.0W NR Bartram7118619197
2A55 7.0W CC Marotta7115921182
3A55 7.0W PW Blesi53131127213
4A55 7.0W MV O'Shaughnessy4415921183
5A55 7.0W MV Gustafson44141023210
6A55 7.0W CV Lockert44111332245
7A55 7.0W BA Silverstein35111331234
8A55 7.0W NC Pinney2681633225
9A55 7.0W PW Reid0832142261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Marla Silverstein
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Julie Brubaker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Heather Pollack
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Bridget Pavlish
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.96
Pam Roche
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Kelly Pamer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Karen Trecarichi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Yolanda Hohman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Brush
published
Kathy Kramer
published
Laura Hughes
published
Lisa Dowling
published
Pam Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Brubaker + Yolanda Hohman8060% games+10.2% vs expected
Laura Hughes + Marla Silverstein5654% games+6.8% vs expected
Laura Hughes + Yolanda Hohman3354% games+2.5% vs expected
Bridget Pavlish + Marla Silverstein291255% games+1.7% vs expected
Kelly Pamer + Karen Trecarichi71045% games−1.7% vs expected
Heather Pollack + Marla Silverstein3545% games−6.6% vs expected
Bridget Pavlish + Heather Pollack2443% games−9.0% vs expected
Heather Pollack + Yolanda Hohman2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marla Silverstein
94W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Julie Brubaker
103W–107L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Heather Pollack
50W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Bridget Pavlish
73W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Pam Roche
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kelly Pamer
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Karen Trecarichi
25W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.73
Yolanda Hohman
50W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.69
Jennifer Brush
30W–47L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Kramer
25W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Hughes
19W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Dowling
47W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Nelson
18W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.