Teams

A55 7.0W CV Lockert

2025 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Spring · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs A55 7.0W PW ReidWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Kinnett / Kathy Olson vs Laura Fechter / Teresa Hardy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDina Fisher / Laura Weyenberg vs Sunnie Bauer / Sarah Vergon6-2, 7-6
2025-04-10vs A55 7.0W NC PinneyWon 10
W#2 DoublesLiz O'Neil / Karen Lovejoy vs Stephanie Bailey / Dana Pinney7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs A55 7.0W BA SilversteinWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Olson / Kristin Hofer vs Heather Pollack / Lisa Dowling2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCandace Kelly / Sharon Prindle vs Laura Hughes / Kathy Kramer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiz O'Neil / Carol Duber vs Yolanda Hohman / Kelly Pamer6-3, 6-4
2025-03-20vs A55 7.0W NR BartramLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Shepard / Joan Tiefel vs Amy Grace / Mary Mays4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSharon Prindle / Kristin Hofer vs Lynne Hanna / Vanessa Furrer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Lovejoy / Liz O'Neil vs Jean Harsar / Kristen Boll5-7, 5-7
2025-03-13vs A55 7.0W PW BlesiLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Kinnett / Kathy Olson vs Jennifer Atkinson / Sheryl Martin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Hofer / Amy Shepard vs Renda Little / Pam Stepnick0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Ellis / Karen Lovejoy vs Karen Lanigan / Susan Olson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-06vs A55 7.0W MV O'ShaughnessyLost 02
L#2 DoublesKristin Hofer / Sharon Prindle vs Janet Ellen Elder / Janice Schmitt2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Duber / Laura Weyenberg vs Audrey Heckaman / Julie Hazle-Davis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-27vs A55 7.0W CC MarottaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoan Tiefel / Kristin Hofer vs Christa Galehouse / Jill Diamond0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Weyenberg / Karen Lovejoy vs Danielle Simpson / Carolyn Cheverine2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-20vs A55 7.0W MV GustafsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesDina Fisher / Laura Weyenberg vs Cheryl Kanetsky / Yulia Lyublinski0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Olson / Kristin Hofer vs Holly Vanjo / Holly Vilsack6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Ellis / Karen Lovejoy vs Lynn Sands / Patti Baucco7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A55 7.0W NR Bartram7118619197
2A55 7.0W CC Marotta7115921182
3A55 7.0W PW Blesi53131127213
4A55 7.0W MV O'Shaughnessy4415921183
5A55 7.0W MV Gustafson44141023210
6A55 7.0W CV Lockert44111332245
7A55 7.0W BA Silverstein35111331234
8A55 7.0W NC Pinney2681633225
9A55 7.0W PW Reid0832142261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Laura Weyenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Cindy Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Liz O'Neil
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Nancy Kinnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Joan Tiefel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Kristin Hofer
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.15
Sharon Prindle
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Amy Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Carol Duber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Karen Lovejoy
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Dina Fisher
published
Kathy Olson
published
Kimberley Lockert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Hamers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Olson + Nancy Kinnett7356% games+5.5% vs expected
Liz O'Neil + Amy Shepard4258% games+1.7% vs expected
Liz O'Neil + Maria Hamers4645% games−3.8% vs expected
Laura Weyenberg + Cindy Ellis3645% games−6.4% vs expected
Karen Lovejoy + Sharon Prindle61941% games−7.2% vs expected
Sharon Prindle + Kristin Hofer2445% games−9.4% vs expected
Karen Lovejoy + Liz O'Neil4447% gamesnot enough data
Liz O'Neil + Joan Tiefel5358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Weyenberg
142W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Cindy Ellis
58W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Liz O'Neil
60W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Nancy Kinnett
102W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Joan Tiefel
47W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristin Hofer
111W–99L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Sharon Prindle
112W–147L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Shepard
67W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Carol Duber
62W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Lovejoy
137W–133L career · 11 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Dina Fisher
71W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Olson
64W–47L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberley Lockert
43W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Hamers
33W–39L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.