Teams

TAG TEAL

2024 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-11vs CSU GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Chenore / Deirdre White vs Carri Miller / Marcia Stauter3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Shannon Bigner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelissa Dalton / Amber Nichols vs Wendy Sprague / Jamie Heckman3-6, 4-6
2024-05-09vs LT BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Chenore / Amber Nichols vs Janice Sale / Bernita Sterling2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Tina Spicer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Herold / Melissa Dalton vs Carolyn Everhart / Helen Migchelbrink2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-21vs LVTA SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Mooney-Malone / Thora Pabst vs Geneva Ritsch / Sarah Duty3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Kristi van Buren7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeirdre White / Amy Herold vs Michelle Moore / Magdalena Joyce6-7, 3-6
2024-04-13vs FCCC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Herold / Thora Pabst vs Crystal Osthoff / Marla Terwilliger3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLori Mooney-Malone vs Jane Roberti1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDeirdre White / Melissa Dalton vs Angie Decklever / Alison Morgan0-6, 2-6
2024-03-30vs HMTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Mooney-Malone / Amber Nichols vs Crystal Stowe / Susan Seiler3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Alli Lackey3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Chenore / Thora Pabst vs Michelle Fang / Kristin Daniels2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LVTA SILVER319310104
2LT ORANGE135715105
3TAG TEAL1451023163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Lori Mooney-Malone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.66
Beth Smits
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Amy Herold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Sandy Chenore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Amber Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Thora Pabst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Deirdre White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Melissa Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Dalton + Amy Herold4445% games+1.6% vs expected
Deirdre White + Thora Pabst3448% games+1.4% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Lori Mooney-Malone1538% games−2.1% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Amy Herold8744% games−2.4% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Sandy Chenore0735% games−3.3% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Deirdre White3540% games−5.1% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Amy Herold1932% games−9.8% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Lori Mooney-Malone2636% games−11.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lori Mooney-Malone
19W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Beth Smits
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Amy Herold
19W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Sandy Chenore
17W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Amber Nichols
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%62%38%
2.46
3
Thora Pabst
30W–85L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.45
2.5
Deirdre White
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Dalton
7W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.